首页> 外文期刊>Religions >Adam Smith, the Impartial Spectator and Embodiment: Towards an Economics of Accountability and Dialogue
【24h】

Adam Smith, the Impartial Spectator and Embodiment: Towards an Economics of Accountability and Dialogue

机译:亚当·斯密(Adam Smith),公正的旁观者和体现:走向问责制和对话经济学

获取原文
       

摘要

This article argues that Adam Smith’s notion of sympathy and the impartial spectator in his work The Theory of Moral Sentiments [1759] connects the individual to society. In this work, Smith’s economics are far more complex than mere self-interest as a driver of commerce. Self-interest functions within a socio-ethical framework that limits excess and narcissism. However, morality was not based on normative assumptions for Smith and Hume. Morality was directly linked to social and cognitive processes in which the approbation of others was important. In other words, behaviour was based on the perceptions of others; therefore, action was to be adjusted to obtain sympathy. The impartial spectator refers to the cognitive process in which moral assessments are made. Therefore, the empiricism of Smith differs from determinism as related to physical causation because it operates through habituation and/or socialisation that can accommodate change and variation. Clearly, the socio-cultural presupposition of society directly influences the moral judgment of the individual. However, this deterministic tendency may result in an uncritical assessment of moral behaviour. To address this potential limitation of determinism, the embodied phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty is explored as an alternative theory which attempts to move beyond a dualism rooted in materialism/idealism. This perspective may expand on Smith’s economics by adding a more inclusive assessment of behaviour. Specifically, Merleau-Ponty’s corporeality provides a theory of behaviour that goes beyond a particular society’s perceptions of acceptable behaviour. This framework may provide the impartial spectator with a more encompassing perspective on moral assessment that may also be beneficial for sustainable commerce. It will be proposed that Merleau-Ponty’s embodied phenomenology and the hyper-dialectic of the flesh highlights the role of accountability and dialogue in moral assessment that may contribute to responsible economics in the South African context.
机译:本文认为,亚当·斯密(Adam Smith)的同情概念和公正的旁观者在其《道德情感理论》 [1759]中将个人与社会联系在一起。在这项工作中,史密斯的经济学远不只是单纯的出于自身利益的商业驱动力。自我利益在限制过度和自恋的社会伦理框架内发挥作用。但是,道德不是基于Smith和Hume的规范假设。道德与社会和认知过程直接相关,在其中,对他人的认可很重要。换句话说,行为是基于他人的看法。因此,必须调整行动以取得同情。公正的旁观者是指进行道德评估的认知过程。因此,史密斯的经验主义与决定论在物理因果关系上有所不同,因为它是通过适应变化和变异的习惯化和/或社会化运作的。显然,社会的社会文化预设直接影响个人的道德判断。但是,这种确定性趋势可能导致对道德行为的非批判性评估。为了解决决定论的这一潜在局限性,人们探索了梅洛-庞蒂的具体现象学作为一种替代理论,试图超越植根于唯物主义/理想主义的二元论。通过增加对行为的更具包容性的评估,这种观点可能会扩展史密斯的经济学。具体来说,梅洛-庞蒂的体态性提供了一种行为理论,超出了特定社会对可接受行为的理解。该框架可以为公正的旁观者提供关于道德评估的更全面的观点,这也可能对可持续商业有利。有人提议说,梅洛-庞蒂的现象学和肉体的超言辞突出了责任感和对话在道德评估中的作用,这可能有助于南非背景下的负责任的经济学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号