...
首页> 外文期刊>Research Journal of Applied Sciences: RJAS >Assessment of the Effectiveness of Individual and Group Extension Methods: A Case Study of Vi-Agroforestry Project in Uganda
【24h】

Assessment of the Effectiveness of Individual and Group Extension Methods: A Case Study of Vi-Agroforestry Project in Uganda

机译:评估个人和团体推广方法的有效性:以乌干达的Vi农林业项目为例

获取原文

摘要

Currently, in Uganda there is no well-defined forestry extension service despite the emphasis in the policy to establish extension services to assist farmers to grow their own trees. Many agricultural service providers have used group and individual methods to disseminate agroforestry technologies to farmers with varying degree of success. A study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of group and individual extension methods in delivering agroforestry technologies at Vi-Agroforestry project, Masaka district. Questionnaires were administered to nine randomly selected farmers who had received extension services from the project. Participatory Rural Appraisals (PRAs) were used in four villages. In addition, twelve project extension workers were interviewed. Project manuals and reports were also studied. Data were analysed using SPSS computer package and descriptive analysis. A statistical t-test was carried out to assess the influence of group and individual extension methods on farmers` adoption of agroforestry technologies. Group and individual methods were found to have varying degree of success on farmers? implementation of agroforestry technologies (t = 3.55, p<0.05) from one household to another. In disseminating agroforestry technologies, group methods were found to be the most effective. Many farmers preferred group compared to individual method. Much as group methods were more effective, service providers should sustain both methods in order to address a variety of farmer characteristics.
机译:目前,尽管乌干达在政策上强调建立推广服务以帮助农民种植自己的树木,但乌干达却没有明确的林业推广服务。许多农业服务提供者已采用集体和个体方法向农户推广农林业技术,并取得了不同程度的成功。在Masaka地区的Vi-Agroforestry项目中进行了一项研究,以评估集体推广和个体推广方法在提供农林业技术方面的有效性。对从该项目获得推广服务的9名随机选择的农民进行了问卷调查。在四个村庄使用了参与式农村评估。此外,还采访了十二名项目扩展人员。还对项目手册和报告进行了研究。使用SPSS计算机软件包和描述性分析来分析数据。进行了统计t检验,以评估集体推广和个体推广方法对农民采用农林业技术的影响。小组和个人方法在农民身上取得不同程度的成功?从一个家庭到另一个家庭实施农林业技术(t = 3.55,p <0.05)。在传播农林业技术时,发现分组方法是最有效的。与个体方法相比,许多农民更喜欢使用群体。尽管采用分组方式更为有效,但服务提供商应同时采用两种方式,以解决各种农民的特点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号