首页> 外文期刊>Research Involvement and Engagement >Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventions
【24h】

Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventions

机译:在公共卫生干预措施的共创和评估中利用参与式方法的框架,原则和建议

获取原文
       

摘要

Plain English summary Background: Society has to cope with a large burden of health issues. There is need to find solutions to prevent diseases and help individuals live healthier lifestyles. Individual needs and circumstances vary greatly and one size fit all solutions do not tend to work well. More tailored solutions centred on individuals’ needs and circumstances can be developed in collaboration with these individuals. This process, known as co-creation, has shown promise but it requires guiding principles to improve its effectiveness. The aim of this study was to identify a key set of principles and recommendations for co-creating public health interventions. Methods: These principles were collaboratively developed through analysing a set of case studies targeting different health behaviours (such as reducing sitting and improving strength and balance) in different groups of people (such as adolescent schoolgirls and older adults living in the community). Results: The key principles of co-creation are presented in four stages: Planning (what is the purpose of the co-creation; and who should be involved?); Conducting (what activities can be used during co-creation; and how to ensure buy-in and commitment?); Evaluating (how do we know the process and the outcome are valid and effective?) and Reporting (how to report the findings?). Three models are proposed to show how co-created solutions can be scaled up to a population level. Conclusions: These recommendations aim to help the co-creation of public health interventions by providing a framework and governance to guide the process. Background: Due to the chronic disease burden on society, there is a need for preventive public health interventions to stimulate society towards a healthier lifestyle. To deal with the complex variability between individual lifestyles and settings, collaborating with end-users to develop interventions tailored to their unique circumstances has been suggested as a potential way to improve effectiveness and adherence. Co-creation of public health interventions using participatory methodologies has shown promise but lacks a framework to make this process systematic. The aim of this paper was to identify and set key principles and recommendations for systematically applying participatory methodologies to co-create and evaluate public health interventions. Methods: These principles and recommendations were derived using an iterative reflection process, combining key learning from published literature in addition to critical reflection on three case studies conducted by research groups in three European institutions, all of whom have expertise in co-creating public health interventions using different participatory methodologies. Results: Key principles and recommendations for using participatory methodologies in public health?intervention co-creation are presented for the stages of: Planning (framing the aim of the study and identifying the appropriate sampling strategy); Conducting (defining the procedure, in addition to manifesting ownership); Evaluating (the process and the effectiveness) and Reporting (providing guidelines to report the findings). Three scaling models are proposed to demonstrate how to scale locally developed interventions to a population level. Conclusions: These recommendations aim to facilitate public health intervention co-creation and evaluation utilising participatory methodologies by ensuring the process is systematic and reproducible.
机译:普通英语摘要背景:社会必须应对沉重的健康问题。需要找到预防疾病和帮助个人过健康生活方式的解决方案。个体的需求和情况差异很大,一种尺寸适合所有解决方案并不能很好地发挥作用。可以与这些人合作开发针对个人需求和情况的量身定制的解决方案。这个过程被称为共同创造,已经显示出希望,但是它需要指导原则来提高其有效性。这项研究的目的是为共同制定公共卫生干预措施确定一套关键的原则和建议。方法:这些原则是通过分析一组针对不同人群(例如,青少年女学生和居住在社区中的老年人)不同健康行为(例如,减少坐着,提高力量和平衡)的案例研究而共同开发的。结果:共创造的关键原则分四个阶段提出:规划(共创造的目的是什么;应由谁参与?);进行(共同创建期间可以使用哪些活动;以及如何确保买入和承诺?);评估(我们如何知道该过程和结果是有效和有效的?)和报告(如何报告这些发现?)。提出了三个模型来显示如何将共同创建的解决方案扩展到总体水平。结论:这些建议旨在通过提供指导过程的框架和治理来帮助共同创建公共卫生干预措施。背景:由于慢性疾病给社会造成了负担,因此需要采取预防性公共卫生干预措施,以刺激社会朝着更健康的生活方式发展。为了应对个体生活方式和环境之间复杂的变异性,已建议与最终用户合作开发针对其独特情况的量身定制的干预措施,作为提高有效性和依从性的潜在途径。使用参与性方法共同创建公共卫生干预措施已显示出希望,但缺乏使这一过程系统化的框架。本文的目的是确定并设定关键原则和建议,以便系统地应用参与式方法共同创建和评估公共卫生干预措施。方法:这些原则和建议是通过反复反思的过程得出的,结合了对已发表文献的主要学习以及对三个欧洲机构的研究小组进行的三个案例研究的批判性反思,这些机构均具有共同创建公共卫生干预措施的专业知识使用不同的参与方法。结果:在以下阶段,提出了在公共卫生干预共创中使用参与式方法的关键原则和建议:规划(确定研究目标并确定适当的抽样策略);进行(定义程序,除了表现出所有权);评估(过程和有效性)和报告(提供报告结果的指南)。提出了三种扩展模型,以展示如何将本地开发的干预扩展到人口水平。结论:这些建议旨在通过确保过程的系统性和可重复性,促进利用参与性方法共同创建和评估公共卫生干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号