首页> 外文期刊>REAd. Revista Eletrnica de Administrao (Porto Alegre) >SOCIAL CONTROL IN PARTICIPATORY PROCESS: A CASE STUDY OF THE MUNICIPAL HEALTH COUNCIL IN JUIZ DE FORA (MG)EL PROCESO PARTICIPATIVO EN EL CONTROL SOCIAL: UN ESTUDIO DE CASO DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL DE SALUD DE JUIZ DE FORA (MG)
【24h】

SOCIAL CONTROL IN PARTICIPATORY PROCESS: A CASE STUDY OF THE MUNICIPAL HEALTH COUNCIL IN JUIZ DE FORA (MG)EL PROCESO PARTICIPATIVO EN EL CONTROL SOCIAL: UN ESTUDIO DE CASO DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL DE SALUD DE JUIZ DE FORA (MG)

机译:参与过程中的社会控制:以JUIZ DE FORA(MG)的城市健康理事会为例参与过程中的社会控制:以JUIZ DE FORA(MG)的城市健康理事会为例

获取原文
           

摘要

Stimulated by the mobilization of civil society since the 80s and first idealized by professionals, municipal health councils were created in Brazil in 1990. Present now in all over Brazil, its existence gives features of social control on the public management, allowing the citizens to participate of definition, execution and monitoring on public policies. In this context, this paper aims to characterize the participatory process in the social control of Municipal Health Council in Juiz de Fora (CMS/FJ). Methodologically this paper is essentially qualitative, in which the data were collected by semi structured interviews, documental analysis and non-participant observation. All these data had been analyzed by content analysis. Based on two categories - listening process and the role of counselor, the findings show that the debated topics in the health council are vast and diverse, as well as the participation of users is strong. Despite these positive findings, critical points have raised up, as attempts to coercion, lack of fruitful debate, scarce time for discussions in deep, existence of barriers to the deliberative process, and discursive asymmetry.
机译:自80年代开始动员民间社会并由专业人员理想化,市政卫生委员会于1990年在巴西成立。市政卫生委员会目前遍布巴西各地,其存在具有对公共管理的社会控制特征,允许公民参与公共政策的定义,执行和监控。在这种背景下,本文旨在描述Juiz de Fora(CMS / FJ)市卫生委员会对社会控制的参与过程。从方法上说,本文本质上是定性的,其中的数据是通过半结构化访谈,文献分析和非参与者观察收集的。所有这些数据均已通过内容分析进行了分析。基于聆听过程和辅导员的角色这两个类别,研究结果表明,卫生委员会中辩论的话题广泛而多样,而且使用者的参与也很强烈。尽管取得了这些积极的发现,但由于进行胁迫的尝试,缺乏富有成果的辩论,缺乏深入讨论的时间,审议过程的障碍和不对称现象的提出,临界点已经上升。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号