...
首页> 外文期刊>Lung India >Significance of upper airway influence among patients of vocal cord dysfunction for its diagnosis: Role of impulse oscillometry
【24h】

Significance of upper airway influence among patients of vocal cord dysfunction for its diagnosis: Role of impulse oscillometry

机译:上呼吸道影响对声带功能障碍患者的诊断意义:脉冲示波法的作用

获取原文

摘要

Background:To identify the patients of bronchial asthma (suspected or proven), not responding to optimal therapy, for the presence of vocal cord dysfunction (VCD) and to compare the diagnostic ability of flow volume (FV) loop and impulse oscillometry (IOS).Materials and Methods:Fifty one patients of suspected/proven bronchial asthma not responding to optimal therapy were included for the study. Each patient was subjected to both FV loop and IOS studies. Direct visualization of the vocal cords with flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope for the presence of inspiratory vocal cord adduction during quiet respiration, with speech, and while performing provocative maneuvers was carried out. All patients were subjected to simple pulmonary function tests and recording of FV loop. IOS was performed on each patient to look for the site of obstruction and upper airway influence. The observations of both FV loop and IO studies were compared.Results:Among 51 patients participated, 12 (23.53%) had bronchoscopical evidence of VCD and were labeled as VCD-positive group and rest 39 were designated VCD negative. No statistically significant difference in pulmonary function test (prereversibility) results between the VCD-positive and VCD-negative patients was found. Reversible airway obstruction was observed in 75% of the patients of VCD-positive group and 67.65% of the patients in the VCD-negative group. Only one patient in the VCD-positive and none in VCD-negative group had inspiratory limb flattening of FV loop. Upper airway influence was evident by IOS in 58.3% of patients in the VCD-positive group and in 15.4% of patients in the VCD-negative group. This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.005).Conclusion:VCD was a common finding in patients with symptoms suggestive of asthma and frequently coexists with asthma. IOS was found to be a useful screening test for VCD and was more sensitive than FV loop.
机译:背景:确定是否存在对声带功能障碍(VCD)的支气管哮喘(疑似或确诊),对最佳疗法没有反应的患者,并比较流量(FV)回路和脉冲示波法(IOS)的诊断能力材料与方法:51例怀疑/证实支气管哮喘对最佳治疗无效的患者被纳入研究。每位患者均接受FV循环和IOS研究。使用柔性纤维支气管镜对声带进行直接可视化,以观察在安静的呼吸过程中,有言语并进行挑衅性操作时吸气性声带内收的情况。所有患者均接受了简单的肺功能测试并记录了FV循环。对每位患者进行IOS,以寻找阻塞和上呼吸道影响的部位。结果:在51例患者中,有12例(占23.53%)的支气管镜下证据为VCD,被标记为VCD阳性组,其余39例被定为VCD阴性。在VCD阳性和VCD阴性患者之间,肺功能测试(可逆性)结果无统计学意义差异。 VCD阳性组中75%的患者和VCD阴性组中67.65%的患者观察到可逆性气道阻塞。 VCD阳性组中只有1例患者,而VCD阴性组中无1例患者出现FV环吸气肢体扁平。 IOS在VCD阳性组中占58.3%,在VCD阴性组中占15.4%,对上呼吸道影响明显。该差异具有统计学意义(P <0.005)。结论:VCD是具有哮喘症状并经常与哮喘共存的患者的常见发现。发现IOS是对VCD有用的筛选测试,并且比FV循环更敏感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号