首页> 外文期刊>Life Science Journal >Laparoscopic Gastric Plication versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy as a Surgical Treatment of Morbid Obesity
【24h】

Laparoscopic Gastric Plication versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy as a Surgical Treatment of Morbid Obesity

机译:腹腔镜胃切除术与腹腔镜袖胃切除术作为病态肥胖的外科治疗

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Morbid obesity increases the risk for many associated diseases including hypertension, type II diabetes, and cardiac diseases.The present study aims to compare between laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic gastric plication as regarding the feasibility, complication and effectiveness in weight loss. Methods: This is a prospective comparative study conducted between June 2011 and May 2014, which included 60 patients, divided into 2 groups, group (A) included 30 patients (17 females and 13 males) who underwent laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (LSG),and group (B) included 30 patients (16 females and 14 males) who underwent laparoscopic gastric plication (LGP). The mean BMI was 42.85±3.8 kg/m2 for group (A) and 41.92±5.7 kg/m2 for group (B). And mean age was 39.5±8.6 years for group (A) and was 40.2±3.6 years for group (B). Follow up for all cases were recorded at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. The comparison between the 2 groups was done as regarding operative time, complications and percentage of excess weight loss. Results: In the present study, all procedures were done laparoscopically without the need for conversion. There were4 cases showed intra-operative bleeding in LSG group and 3 cases at LGP group. The mean operative time was 78±26 minutes for the LSG group and 90±7.5minutes for the LGP group (P< 0.05). The mean hospital stay was 3.2±1.7days in the LSG group and 3.9±2.3days in the LGP group (P=0.00473). The excess weight loss (EWL) at 1, 3, 6,and 12 months was 19.8%, 30.4%, 48.6%,and 59.4% respectively for LSG group, while in LGP group, it was 18.7%, 28.9%, 45.8%, and 56.6%, respectively. There is no weight regain recorded up to date in all patients. Conclusion: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG)and laparoscopic gastric placation(LGP), both are gastric restrictive technique for treatment of morbid obesity, but LSG is superior to LGP regarding percentage of EWL and operative time. However, long terms follow up and large prospective randomized controlled studies are still needed.
机译:背景:病态肥胖增加了许多相关疾病的风险,包括高血压,II型糖尿病和心脏疾病。本研究旨在比较腹腔镜垂直袖胃切除术和腹腔镜胃手术在减肥的可行性,并发症和有效性方面的差异。方法:这是一项于2011年6月至2014年5月之间进行的前瞻性比较研究,其中包括60例患者,分为2组,(A)组包括30例行腹腔镜垂直袖胃切除术(LSG)的患者(17例女性和13例男性), (B)组包括30例行腹腔镜胃镜手术(LGP)的患者(16例女性和14例男性)。 (A)组的平均BMI为42.85±3.8 kg / m2,(B)组的平均BMI为41.92±5.7 kg / m2。 (A)组的平均年龄为39.5±8.6岁,(B)组的平均年龄为40.2±3.6岁。在1、3、6、12个月对所有病例进行随访。两组之间在手术时间,并发症和体重减轻百分比方面进行了比较。结果:在本研究中,所有手术均在腹腔镜下完成,无需转换。 LSG组有4例出现术中出血,LGP组有3例。 LSG组平均手术时间为78±26分钟,LGP组平均手术时间为90±7.5分钟(P <0.05)。 LSG组的平均住院时间为3.2±1.7天,LGP组的平均住院时间为3.9±2.3天(P = 0.00473)。 LSG组在1、3、6和12个月时的多余体重减轻(EWL)分别为19.8%,30.4%,48.6%和59.4%。 18.7%,28.9%,45.8%和56.6%。到目前为止,所有患者均未记录体重增加。结论:腹腔镜袖胃切除术(LSG)和腹腔镜胃塞术(LGP)都是治疗病态肥胖的胃限制性技术,但是LSG在EWL百分比和手术时间方面优于LGP。但是,需要长期随访,仍需要进行大规模的前瞻性随机对照研究。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Life Science Journal》 |2016年第1期|共7页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类 药学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 12:16:51

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号