首页> 外文期刊>LIPIcs : Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics >Strategy-Proof Approximation Algorithms for the Stable Marriage Problem with Ties and Incomplete Lists
【24h】

Strategy-Proof Approximation Algorithms for the Stable Marriage Problem with Ties and Incomplete Lists

机译:带关系和不完整列表的稳定婚姻问题的策略证明近似算法

获取原文
       

摘要

In the stable marriage problem (SM), a mechanism that always outputs a stable matching is called a stable mechanism. One of the well-known stable mechanisms is the man-oriented Gale-Shapley algorithm (MGS). MGS has a good property that it is strategy-proof to the men's side, i.e., no man can obtain a better outcome by falsifying a preference list. We call such a mechanism a man-strategy-proof mechanism. Unfortunately, MGS is not a woman-strategy-proof mechanism. (Of course, if we flip the roles of men and women, we can see that the woman-oriented Gale-Shapley algorithm (WGS) is a woman-strategy-proof but not a man-strategy-proof mechanism.) Roth has shown that there is no stable mechanism that is simultaneously man-strategy-proof and woman-strategy-proof, which is known as Roth's impossibility theorem. In this paper, we extend these results to the stable marriage problem with ties and incomplete lists (SMTI). Since SMTI is an extension of SM, Roth's impossibility theorem takes over to SMTI. Therefore, we focus on the one-sided-strategy-proofness. In SMTI, one instance can have stable matchings of different sizes, and it is natural to consider the problem of finding a largest stable matching, known as MAX SMTI. Thus we incorporate the notion of approximation ratios used in the theory of approximation algorithms. We say that a stable-mechanism is a c-approximate-stable mechanism if it always returns a stable matching of size at least 1/c of a largest one. We also consider a restricted variant of MAX SMTI, which we call MAX SMTI-1TM, where only men's lists can contain ties (and women's lists must be strictly ordered). Our results are summarized as follows: (i) MAX SMTI admits both a man-strategy-proof 2-approximate-stable mechanism and a woman-strategy-proof 2-approximate-stable mechanism. (ii) MAX SMTI-1TM admits a woman-strategy-proof 2-approximate-stable mechanism. (iii) MAX SMTI-1TM admits a man-strategy-proof 1.5-approximate-stable mechanism. All these results are tight in terms of approximation ratios. Also, all these results apply for strategy-proofness against coalitions.
机译:在稳定婚姻问题(SM)中,始终输出稳定匹配项的机制称为稳定机制。众所周知的稳定机制之一是面向人的Gale-Shapley算法(MGS)。 MGS具有良好的特性,即它对男性而言是策略性的,即,没有任何人可以通过伪造偏好列表来获得更好的结果。我们称这种机制为防人为策略机制。不幸的是,MGS并不是防止女性策略的机制。 (当然,如果我们翻转男人和女人的角色,我们可以看到面向女性的Gale-Shapley算法(WGS)是一种防女性策略的机制,而不是防男性策略的机制。)罗斯已经证明了这一点。没有一个稳定的机制可以同时防止男策略和女策略,这被称为罗斯不可能定理。在本文中,我们将这些结果扩展到具有联系和不完整列表(SMTI)的稳定婚姻问题。由于SMTI是SM的扩展,因此Roth的不可能定理取代了SMTI。因此,我们专注于单方面策略的可靠性。在SMTI中,一个实例可以具有不同大小的稳定匹配,因此自然而然地考虑寻找最大稳定匹配(称为MAX SMTI)的问题。因此,我们并入了近似算法理论中使用的近似比率的概念。我们说,稳定机制如果始终返回大小至少为最大大小的1 / c的稳定匹配,则它是c近似稳定的机制。我们还考虑了MAX SMTI的一个受限制的变体,我们称之为MAX SMTI-1TM,其中只有男性列表可以包含领带(并且女性列表必须严格排序)。我们的研究结果总结如下:(i)MAX SMTI既接受防男性策略的2近似稳定机制,也接受接受女性策略的2近似稳定机制。 (ii)MAX SMTI-1TM接纳了一种防女性策略的2近似稳定机制。 (iii)MAX SMTI-1TM具备防人为策略的1.5近似稳定机制。所有这些结果在近似比率方面都是严格的。同样,所有这些结果都适用于针对联盟的战略证明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号