【24h】

Solar Cycle Prediction

机译:太阳周期预测

获取原文
       

摘要

A review of solar cycle prediction methods and their performance is given, including forecasts for cycle 24. The review focuses on those aspects of the solar cycle prediction problem that have a bearing on dynamo theory. The scope of the review is further restricted to the issue of predicting the amplitude (and optionally the epoch) of an upcoming solar maximum no later than right after the start of the given cycle. Prediction methods form three main groups. Precursor methods rely on the value of some measure of solar activity or magnetism at a specified time to predict the amplitude of the following solar maximum. Their implicit assumption is that each numbered solar cycle is a consistent unit in itself, while solar activity seems to consist of a series of much less tightly intercorrelated individual cycles. Extrapolation methods, in contrast, are based on the premise that the physical process giving rise to the sunspot number record is statistically homogeneous, i.e., the mathematical regularities underlying its variations are the same at any point of time and, therefore, it lends itself to analysis and forecasting by time series methods. Finally, instead of an analysis of observational data alone, model based predictions use physically (more or less) consistent dynamo models in their attempts to predict solar activity. In their overall performance during the course of the last few solar cycles, precursor methods have clearly been superior to extrapolation methods. Nevertheless, most precursor methods overpredicted cycle 23, while some extrapolation methods may still be worth further study. Model based forecasts have not yet had a chance to prove their skills. One method that has yielded predictions consistently in the right range during the past few solar cycles is that of K. Schatten et al., whose approach is mainly based on the polar field precursor. The incipient cycle 24 will probably mark the end of the Modern Maximum, with the Sun switching to a state of less strong activity. It will therefore be an important testbed for cycle prediction methods and, by inference, for our understanding of the solar dynamo.
机译:对太阳周期预测方法及其性能进行了综述,包括对周期24的预测。该综述着重于太阳周期预测问题中与发电机理论有关的方面。审查的范围进一步限于在给定周期开始后立即预测即将到来的太阳最大值的幅度(以及可能的时期)的问题。预测方法分为三大类。前体方法依赖于特定时间的某种太阳活动或磁性度量值,以预测随后的太阳最大值的幅度。他们隐含的假设是,每个编号的太阳周期本身都是一个一致的单位,而太阳活动似乎由一系列相互关系不那么紧密的单个周期组成。相反,外推法是基于这样的前提,即产生黑子数记录的物理过程在统计上是同质的,即,其变化背后的数学规律在任何时间点都是相同的,因此很适合时间序列方法进行分析和预测。最后,基于模型的预测不是仅对观测数据进行分析,而是在物理上(或多或少)一致的发电机模型来尝试预测太阳活动。在最后几个太阳周期过程中的整体性能方面,前驱方法明显优于外推方法。然而,大多数前体方法高估了循环23,而某些外推方法可能仍值得进一步研究。基于模型的预测尚未有机会证明其技能。 K. Schatten等人的一种方法在过去几个太阳周期内始终能在正确的范围内产生预测,该方法主要基于极场前兆。初始周期24可能标志着现代极大值的结束,而太阳会切换到强度较低的状态。因此,它将成为周期预测方法的重要试验平台,并据此推论对我们对太阳发电机的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号