...
首页> 外文期刊>Nutrients >A Web-Based 24-H Dietary Recall Could Be a Valid Tool for the Indicative Assessment of Dietary Intake in Older Adults Living in Slovenia
【24h】

A Web-Based 24-H Dietary Recall Could Be a Valid Tool for the Indicative Assessment of Dietary Intake in Older Adults Living in Slovenia

机译:基于Web的24小时饮食召回可能是指示性评估生活在斯洛文尼亚老年人中膳食摄入量的有效工具

获取原文

摘要

The methodology used in dietary surveys could, to a large extent, follow the instructions of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), where 24-h dietary recall (24HDR) is recommended for (sub) population studies. However, it is necessary to examine the suitability of 24HDR for indicative dietary intake in older adults. This study aimed to compare participants’ dietary intakes with the recommendations and to compare dietary intakes derived from a 24HDR using an OPEN web-based application to those obtained from reference weighed food records (WFRs). Forty-nine Slovenian residential home residents completed both assessments, and a comparison with dietary reference values was performed. Estimates from these two methods were compared and the correlations between them were assessed. The findings revealed that dietary intakes derived from the WFR method mostly differed from the recommended intakes. The 24HDR underestimated dietary intake compared to the WFR for 66% of monitored parameters, while 75% of these parameters were correlated, mostly at a moderate level (0.3–0.69). In conclusion, the diets of residential home residents in this study mostly differed from recommendations. Both methods for dietary intake assessment provided comparable results for most of the monitored parameters in expected deviations. A web-based 24HDR could be a valid tool for the indicative assessment of dietary intake in older adults. However, further validations are required.
机译:饮食调查中使用的方法在很大程度上可以遵循欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)的指示,在该机构中,建议(亚)人群研究使用24小时饮食回想(24HDR)。但是,有必要检查24HDR是否适合老年人指示性饮食摄入。这项研究旨在将参与者的饮食摄入量与建议进行比较,并比较使用基于OPEN网络的应用程序从24HDR得出的饮食摄入量与从参考称量食物记录(WFR)获得的食物摄入量。四十九名斯洛文尼亚居民住宅居民完成了两项评估,并与饮食参考值进行了比较。比较了这两种方法的估计值,并评估了它们之间的相关性。研究结果表明,从WFR方法获得的饮食摄入量与建议的摄入量大部分不同。与WFR相比,24HDR的饮食摄入量低估了66%的监测参数,而这些参数的75%与相关,大部分处于中等水平(0.3-0.69)。总而言之,本研究中的住宅居民饮食与建议的饮食差异很大。两种饮食摄入量评估方法都为大多数监测参数的预期偏差提供了可比的结果。基于网络的24HDR可能是指示性评估老年人饮食摄入量的有效工具。但是,需要进一步的验证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号