首页> 外文期刊>Norsk Epidemiologi >Hva p?virker krangling og sl?ssing i drikkesituasjoner? En sammenlignende studie av Oslos generelle befolkning og kafégjester i Oslo
【24h】

Hva p?virker krangling og sl?ssing i drikkesituasjoner? En sammenlignende studie av Oslos generelle befolkning og kafégjester i Oslo

机译:什么会影响饮酒环境中的争论和争吵?奥斯陆奥斯陆总人口和咖啡厅客人的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

sAMMENDRAGForm?let med denne studien er, med utgangspunkt i to ulike materialer, ? beskrive negative konsekvenser av egetalkoholbruk. Hva predikerer at urbane mennesker angrer p? noe de har sagt eller gjort, kommer opp i krangel ellerhavner i sl?sskamp under alkoholp?virkning, og er det forskjeller i s? henseende mellom de som er mye og liteeksponert for andre mennesker n?r de drikker? I det s?kalte kafégjestmaterialet ble data innhentet ved hjelp avsp?rreskjemaer besvart av 1053 gjester p? 41 offentlige skjenkesteder i Oslo. I tillegg er det benyttet data fra etrepresentativt utvalg av 297 personer i Oslo (Osloutvalget). Resultatene viste at andelen som rapporterte negativeerfaringer i samband med eget alkoholbruk var h?yere i kafégjestmaterialet enn i Osloutvalget. I beggematerialene rapporterte yngre respondenter oftere enn eldre at de hadde angret p? noe de hadde sagt eller gjort,kranglet med noen og kommet opp i slagsm?l. ? angre p? noe sagt eller gjort hadde ingen sammenheng medantallet timer tilbrakt ukentlig p? kaféer i materialene. Blant kafégjestene, men ikke blant Oslofolk generelt, haddeantall timer tilbrakt ukentlig p? kaféer sammenheng med ? ha kranglet og ? ha sl?ss med noen i en drikkesituasjon.? havne i sl?sskamp eller h?ndgripeligheter hadde sammenheng med antallet timer tilbrakt ukentlig p? kaféer ibegge materialene. Korrelasjonen mellom antall dager med hardere drikkeepisoder p? kafé, og antall timerukentlig p? kafé, var sterk b?de i Osloutvalget og i kafégjestmaterialet. Det er sannsynlig at det er harderedrikking p? utesteder som er avgj?rende for ? krangle eller sl?ss med noen i beruset tilstand, og ikke det ?tilbringe tid p? utesteder per se. Dette tyder p? at st?rre offentlig innsats for ? kontrollere at de bestemmelsenesom gjelder for offentlig skjenking av alkohol overholdes, kan redusere voldsniv?et p? skjenkestedene.Tr?en B.?What influences quarrelling and fighting in drinking situations? A comparative study of thegeneral population in Oslo and caféguests in Oslo.?Nor J Epidemiol 1996; 6 (1): 61-68.ENGLISH SUMMARYThe aim of this study is to describe self reported negative consequences of alcohol consumption during the past 12months in two different samples of urban Norwegians. Which variables predict having regretted something said ordone, having quarrelled and/or fought with someone under the influence of alcohol among urban people, and arethere differences in this respect between persons who are little and much exposed to others in their drinkingsituations? In 1991 a comprehensive questionnaire survey was undertaken among visitors to 41 licensed premisesin Oslo. A total of 1053 guests to the different premises filled in and returned the questionnaire (the caféguestsample). Data from a representative sample of 297 adult persons from Oslo were available for comparison (theOslo sample). The results showed that the percentage of respondent who reported having experienced negativeconsequences in connection with their own drinking, was higher in the caféguest sample than in the Oslo sample.In both samples, younger respondents reported negative consequences more often than older respondents. Therewas no relationship between number of hours spent weekly in licensed premises and having regretted somethingsaid or done under the influence of alcohol in either sample. In the caféguest sample, but not in the Oslo sample,the number of hours spent weekly in licensed premises was related to having quarrelled with someone in adrinking situation. There was a relationship between number of hours spent weekly in licensed premises andhaving fought with someone under the influence of alcohol in both samples. The correlation between number ofdays during the past month with more "heavy" drinking in public drinking places, and number of hours spentweekly in licensed premises, was strong in both samples. Therefore, it seems likely that it is "heavy" drinking inpublic drinking places that is of importance for experiencing negative consequences of drinking, and not spendingtime in licensed premises per se.
机译:总结本研究的目的是基于两种不同的材料?描述自己饮酒的负面后果。是什么预示着城市人会后悔?他们说过或做过的事情,在酒精的影响下陷入争论或结局,这有区别吗?喝酒时很少与其他人接触的人之间的尊重?在所谓的咖啡厅宾客资料中,数据是使用由1053位咖啡厅宾客回答的问卷获得的。奥斯陆的41家公共酒吧。此外,还使用了来自奥斯陆(奥斯陆委员会)297人的代表性样本的数据。结果表明,在咖啡馆客座材料中报告与自己的酒精使用有关的负面经历的比例高于在奥斯陆样本中。在两种材料中,年轻的受访者报告的次数多于他们感到后悔的年龄?他们说过或做过的事,与某人吵架并打架。 ?昂格里普?说什么或做过什么与每周花费的时间无关?网吧中的材料。在咖啡厅的客人中,而不是在奥斯陆的一般人群中,每周花费多少小时?网吧有关系吗?吵架了吗?与处于饮酒状态的人打架。最终打架或戴上手铐与每周花费的时间有关。两种材料的咖啡馆。饮酒次数越多与天数之间的相关性?咖啡馆,每周工作多少小时?咖啡厅,在奥斯陆委员会和咖啡厅的客人资料中都很强大。喝酒可能更难吗?夜店是必不可少的?吵架或与陶醉的人打架,不是要花时间吗?夜总会本身。这暗示吗?更大的公共努力?检查并遵守适用于公共饮酒的法规,可以减少该国的暴力程度。 skjenkestedene.Tr?en B.?在饮酒情况下吵架和打架有什么影响?对奥斯陆总人口和奥斯陆咖啡厅客人的比较研究。诺尔·J·流行病1996 6(1):61-68。英语摘要本研究的目的是描述在两个不同的挪威城市样本中,过去12个月自我报告的饮酒负面影响。哪些变量可以预测说后悔的事情,在城市人群中在酒精的影响下与某人吵架和/或与某人打架,以及在饮酒环境中很少或很少与他人接触的人之间在这方面是否存在差异? 1991年,在奥斯陆的41个持牌经营场所的访客中进行了全面的问卷调查。共有1053名来自不同场所的客人填写并返回了调查表(caféguestsample)。来自奥斯陆的297名成年人的代表性样本的数据可用于比较(theOslo样本)。结果显示,在来宾中,受访者表示自己饮酒有负面影响的百分比高于奥斯陆样本。在两个样本中,年轻的受访者比老年人的受访者报告负面影响的频率更高。在两个样本中,每周在有执照的场所度过的小时数与后悔或在酒精影响下所做的事情之间没有任何关系。在caféguest样本中,而不是在Oslo样本中,每周在有执照的场所中花费的小时数与与处于困境中的人发生争执有关。在两个样本中,每周在有执照的场所度过的小时数与在酒精影响下与某人打架之间存在关联。在两个样本中,过去一个月中在公共饮酒场所饮酒较多的“天”数与每周在许可场所度过的小时数之间的相关性很强。因此,在公共饮酒场所似乎“大量”饮酒对于体验饮酒的负面后果,而不是将时间花在有执照的场所本身很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号