首页> 外文期刊>Nutrients >The Performance of Five Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Prediction Equations against Dual X-ray Absorptiometry in Estimating Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass in an Adult Australian Population
【24h】

The Performance of Five Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Prediction Equations against Dual X-ray Absorptiometry in Estimating Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass in an Adult Australian Population

机译:反对成人X线吸收法的五个生物电阻抗分析预测方程在评估澳大利亚成年人口骨骼肌质量方面的性能

获取原文
           

摘要

Appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) is a diagnostic criterion for sarcopenia. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) offers a bedside approach to measure ASM but the performance of BIA prediction equations (PE) varies with ethnicities and body composition. We aim to validate the performance of five PEs in estimating ASM against estimation by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). We recruited 195 healthy adult Australians and ASM was measured using single-frequency BIA. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the predictive accuracy of ASM as determined by BIA against DXA. Precision (root mean square error (RMSE)) and bias (mean error (ME)) were calculated according to the method of Sheiner and Beal. Four PEs (except that by Kim) showed ASM values that correlated strongly with ASM DXA ( r ranging from 0.96 to 0.97, p < 0.001). The Sergi equation performed the best with the lowest ME of ?1.09 kg (CI: ?0.84–?1.34, p < 0.001) and the RMSE was 2.09 kg (CI: 1.72–2.47). In men, the Kyle equation performed better with the lowest ME (?0.32 kg (CI: ?0.66–0.02) and RMSE (1.54 kg (CI: 1.14–1.93)). The Sergi equation is applicable in adult Australians (Caucasian) whereas the Kyle equation can be considered in males. The need remains to validate PEs in other ethnicities and to develop equations suitable for multi-frequency BIA.
机译:阑尾骨骼肌质量(ASM)是肌肉减少症的诊断标准。生物电阻抗分析(BIA)提供了一种床旁测量ASM的方法,但BIA预测方程(PE)的性能随种族和身体组成而变化。我们旨在通过双能X射线吸收法(DXA)验证五种PE在评估ASM方面的性能。我们招募了195名健康的成年澳大利亚人,并使用单频BIA测量了ASM。用Bland-Altman分析来评估BIA针对DXA确定的ASM预测准确性。根据Sheiner和Beal的方法计算精度(均方根误差(RMSE))和偏差(均值误差(ME))。四个PE(Kim除外)显示的ASM值与ASM DXA高度相关(r为0.96至0.97,p <0.001)。塞尔吉方程表现最好,ME最低,为1.09 kg(CI:0.84–1.34,p <0.001),RMSE为2.09 kg(CI:1.72–2.47)。在男性中,ME(最低0.32 kg(CI:0.66–0.02)和RMSE(1.54 kg(CI:1.14–1.93))最低的情况下,凯尔方程的效果更好。男性可以考虑使用Kyle方程,仍然需要验证其他种族的PE,并开发适用于多频BIA的方程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号