...
首页> 外文期刊>LASER THERAPY >Effectiveness of Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) in the treatment of Lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET): an umbrella review
【24h】

Effectiveness of Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) in the treatment of Lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET): an umbrella review

机译:低水平激光疗法(LLLT)在治疗外侧肘肌腱病(LET)中的有效性:综述

获取原文

摘要

Purpose: The aim of this umbrella review is to determine the effectiveness of LLLT in the treatment of LET and to provide recommendations based on this evidence.Methods: A comprehensive and systematic review was undertaken using Medline, EBSCO and EMBASE. Systematic reviews or meta-analysis were included if they compared Laser with at least one of the following: (i) placebo, (ii) no treatment, (iii) another treatment, conservative (physical therapy intervention or medical) or operative of LET. Principal outcomes included the assessment of short and long-term effect on functional status, pain, grip strength (pain-free or maximum) and a global measure (overall improvement).Results: Seven papers met the inclusion criteria for the umbrella review, Five papers were of moderateand two of low methodological quality. All reviews reported benefits associated with laser therapy Vsother intervention or placebo, however the significance of the identified benefits differed between studiesand reviews. No review reported negative effects of laser therapy or harm to patients. All reviews notedsignificant variance between included studies with 2 reviews citing statistically significant heterogeneity.It is essential to consider this in the interpretation of these data.Conclusion: This umbrella review found poor results for the effectiveness of LLLT in the management ofLET. Therefore, further research with well-designed RCTs is required to provide meaningful evidence onthe effectiveness (absolute and relative) of LLLT for the management of LET.
机译:目的:这项总括性审查的目的是确定LLLT在LET治疗中的有效性,并根据此证据提供建议。方法:使用Medline,EBSCO和EMBASE进行了全面而系统的审查。如果他们将Laser与以下至少一项进行了比较,则包括系统评价或荟萃分析:(i)安慰剂,(ii)无治疗,(iii)另一种治疗,采用LET(保守疗法(物理疗法或医学疗法)或手术)。主要结果包括评估对功能状态,疼痛,握力(无痛或最大)的短期和长期影响以及总体评估(总体改善)。结果:七篇论文符合该伞的纳入标准综述,五篇论文属于中等水平,两篇方法论质量较差。所有评论均报告了与激光疗法相比其他干预或安慰剂相关的益处,但是在研究和评论之间,所确定益处的重要性不同。没有评论报道激光疗法的负面影响或对患者的伤害。所有评论均指出,纳入的研究之间有显着差异,其中2篇评论引用了统计学上的显着异质性。在解释这些数据时必须考虑到这一点。因此,需要对设计合理的RCT进行进一步研究,以提供有关LLLT对LET管理的有效性(绝对和相对)的有意义的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号