首页> 外文期刊>Noise and Health >Comparison of staff and family perceptions of causes of noise pollution in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit and suggested intervention strategies
【24h】

Comparison of staff and family perceptions of causes of noise pollution in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit and suggested intervention strategies

机译:儿科重症监护室工作人员和家庭对噪声污染原因的看法比较以及建议的干预策略

获取原文
           

摘要

Noise and excessive, unwanted sound in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) is common and has a major impact on patients' sleep and recovery. Previous research has focused mostly on absolute noise levels or included only staff as respondents to acknowledge the causes of noise and to plan for its reduction. Thus far, the suggested interventions have not ameliorated noise, and it continues to serve as a barrier to recovery. In addition to surveying PICU providers through internet-based software, patients' families were evaluated through in-person interviews utilizing a pretested instrument over 3 months. Families of patients admitted for more than 24 h were considered eligible for evaluation. Participants were asked to rank causes of noise from 1 to 8, with eight being highest, and identified potential interventions as effective or ineffective. In total, 50 families from 251 admissions and 65 staff completed the survey. Medical alarms were rated highest (mean ± standard deviation [SD], 4.9 ± 2.1 [2.8-7.0]), followed by noise from medical equipment (mean ± SD, 4.7 ± 2.1 [2.5-6.8]). This response was consistent among PICU providers and families. Suggested interventions to reduce noise included keeping a patient's room door closed, considered effective by 93% of respondents (98% of staff; 88% of families), and designated quiet times, considered effective by 82% (80% of staff; 84% of families). Keeping the patient's door closed was the most effective strategy among survey respondents. Most families and staff considered medical alarms an important contributor to noise level. Because decreasing the volume of alarms such that it cannot be heard is inappropriate, alternative strategies to alert staff of changes in vital signs should be explored.
机译:儿科重症监护病房(PICU)中的噪声和多余的有害声音很常见,对患者的睡眠和恢复产生重大影响。先前的研究主要集中在绝对噪声水平上,或者只包括员工作为被调查者,以确认噪声的原因并计划降低噪声的水平。到目前为止,建议的干预措施尚未改善噪音,并且仍继续成为康复的障碍。除了通过基于Internet的软件对PICU提供者进行调查外,还对患者的家属进行了为期3个月的使用预测仪器的面对面访问评估。入院时间超过24小时的患者家庭被认为符合评估条件。要求参与者将噪声原因从1到8进行排序,其中8个是最高的,并确定潜在的干预措施是有效还是无效。共有251名招生者中的50个家庭和65名员工完成了调查。医疗警报的等级最高(平均值±标准偏差[SD],4.9±2.1 [2.8-7.0]),其次是医疗设备发出的噪音(平均值±SD,4.7±2.1 [2.5-6.8])。 PICU提供者和家庭之间的反应是一致的。建议的降低噪音的干预措施包括保持患者房间的门关闭,被93%的受访者(98%的员工; 88%的家庭)认为有效;指定的安静时间,被82%(80%的员工; 84%)认为有效。家庭)。在被调查者中,保持病人的门关闭是最有效的策略。大多数家庭和员工都认为医疗警报是造成噪音水平的重要因素。由于减少警报的音量以至于无法听到是不合适的,因此应探索其他方法来提醒工作人员生命体征的变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号