首页> 外文期刊>Nutrition Bytes >Are There Healthy Sweeteners: The Effects of Sugar Substitutes on the Gut Microbiome
【24h】

Are There Healthy Sweeteners: The Effects of Sugar Substitutes on the Gut Microbiome

机译:是否有健康的甜味剂:糖替代物对肠道微生物组的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: This study was designed to examine the effects of sugar substitutes on the gut microbiome. Methods: PUBMED was used to find articles that studied the gut microbiome after consumption of a sugar substitute in humans. Both observational and interventional studies were selected for this review. Results: Starting with 31 articles found on PUBMED, 5 articles were included to be reviewed after 26 articles were excluded. Three natural sugar substitutes and four categories of artificial sweeteners were studied. Maltitol, lactitol, and isomalt were the natural sugar substitutes, and aspartame, acesulfame-K, non-caloric artificial sweeteners, and saccharin were the artificial sweeteners. The outcomes for Bifidobacteria, Bacteroides, Clostridium, Lactobacilli, Fusobacterium prausnitzii, and Enterobacteriaceae were addressed. Natural sugar substitutes were seen to increase bacterial populations that are believed to be beneficial to humans while artificial sweeteners established bacterial populations that are considered harmful to health. Conclusions: The studies examined suggest cautious use of artificial sweeteners due to its effects on the gut microbiome while natural sugar substitutes could have potential health benefits
机译:目的:本研究旨在检查糖替代品对肠道微生物组的影响。方法:PUBMED被用于寻找研究人类食用糖替代品后肠道微生物组的文章。观察性研究和介入性研究均入选本次审查。结果:从在PUBMED上发现的31篇文章开始,包括5篇文章,其中26篇被排除在外。研究了三种天然糖替代品和四种类别的人造甜味剂。麦芽糖醇,乳糖醇和异麦芽酮糖醇是天然糖的替代品,阿斯巴甜,乙酰磺胺酸钾,无热量的人造甜味剂和糖精是人造甜味剂。解决了双歧杆菌,拟杆菌,梭状芽孢杆菌,乳酸杆菌,普氏梭菌和肠杆菌科的结局。人们认为,天然糖替代品会增加细菌种群,据信这对人体有益,而人造甜味剂则建立了细菌种群,认为对健康有害。结论:审查的研究表明,由于其对肠道微生物组的影响,应谨慎使用人造甜味剂,而天然糖替代品可能具有潜在的健康益处

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号