首页> 外文期刊>Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine >Non-HIV Pneumocystis pneumonia: do conventional community-acquired pneumonia guidelines under estimate its severity?
【24h】

Non-HIV Pneumocystis pneumonia: do conventional community-acquired pneumonia guidelines under estimate its severity?

机译:非HIV肺囊虫性肺炎:常规社区获得性肺炎指南是否能估计其严重性?

获取原文
       

摘要

BackgroundNon-HIV Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) can occur in immunosuppressed patients having malignancy or on immunosuppressive agents. To classify severity, the A-DROP scale proposed by the Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS), the CURB-65 score of the British Respiratory Society (BTS) and the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) are widely used in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in Japan. To evaluate how correctly these conventional prognostic guidelines for CAP reflect the severity of non-HIV PCP, we retrospectively analyzed 21 patients with non-HIV PCP.MethodsA total of 21 patients were diagnosed by conventional staining and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for respiratory samples with chest x-ray and computed tomography (CT) findings. We compared the severity of 21 patients with PCP classified by A-DROP, CURB-65, and PSI. Also, patients’ characteristics, clinical pictures, laboratory results at first visit or admission and intervals from diagnosis to start of specific-PCP therapy were evaluated in both survivor and non-survivor groups.ResultsBased on A-DROP, 18 patients were classified as mild or moderate; respiratory failure developed in 15 of these 18 (83.3%), and 7/15 (46.7%) died. Based on CURB-65, 19 patients were classified as mild or moderate; respiratory failure developed in 16/19 (84.2%), and 8 of the 16 (50%) died. In contrast, PSI classified 14 as severe or extremely severe; all of the 14 (100%) developed respiratory failure and 8/14 (57.1%) died. There were no significant differences in laboratory results in these groups. The time between the initial visit and diagnosis, and the time between the initial visit and starting of specific-PCP therapy were statistically shorter in the survivor group than in the non-survivor group.ConclusionsConventional prognostic guidelines for CAP could underestimate the severity of non-HIV PCP, resulting in a therapeutic delay resulting in high mortality. The most important factor to improve the mortality of non-HIV PCP is early diagnosis and starting of specific-PCP therapy as soon as possible.
机译:背景非HIV肺囊虫性肺炎(PCP)可以发生在免疫抑制的恶性肿瘤患者或免疫抑制剂中。为了对严重程度进行分类,日本呼吸学会(JRS)提出了A-DROP量表,英国呼吸学会(BTS)提出了CURB-65评分,美国传染病学会(IDSA)提出了肺炎严重程度指数(PSI)。在日本广泛用于社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者。为了评估这些常规的CAP预后指南如何正确反映非HIV PCP的严重性,我们回顾性分析了21例非HIV PCP患者。方法通过常规染色和聚合酶链反应(PCR)诊断呼吸道样本共21例患者胸部X光和计算机断层扫描(CT)的发现。我们比较了按A-DROP,CURB-65和PSI分类的21例PCP患者的严重程度。此外,还评估了幸存者和非幸存者组的患者特征,临床影像,首次就诊或入院时的实验室检查结果以及从诊断到开始特异性PCP治疗的间隔时间。结果根据A-DROP,将18例患者归为轻度或中等这18人中有15人(83.3%)出现呼吸衰竭,而7/15(46.7%)死亡。根据CURB-65,将19例患者分为轻度或中度。呼吸衰竭发生在16/19(84.2%),16人中有8人(50%)死亡。相比之下,PSI将14列为严重或极重。 14例(100%)均出现呼吸衰竭,8/14例(57.1%)死亡。这些组的实验室结果无显着差异。幸存者组的首次就诊与诊断之间的时间以及首次就诊与开始特异性PCP治疗之间的时间在统计学上比非幸存者组更短。结论常规的CAP预后指南可能会低估非CAP的严重程度HIV PCP,导致治疗延迟,导致高死亡率。改善非HIV PCP死亡率的最重要因素是早期诊断和尽快开始特异性PCP治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号