首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear technology & radiation protection >Characterization of control rod worths and fuel rod power peaking factors in the university of Utah TRIGA Mark I reactor
【24h】

Characterization of control rod worths and fuel rod power peaking factors in the university of Utah TRIGA Mark I reactor

机译:犹他州TRIGA Mark I反应堆中控制杆价值和燃料杆功率峰值因子的表征

获取原文
           

摘要

Control rod reactivity (worths) for the three control rods and fuel rod power peaking factors in the University of Utah research reactor (100 kW TRIGA Mark I) are characterized using the AGENT code system and the results described in this paper. These values are compared to the MCNP6 and existing experimental measurements. In addition, the eigenvalue, neutron spatial flux distributions and reaction rates are analyzed and discussed. The AGENT code system is widely benchmarked for various reactor types and complexities in their geometric arrangements of the assemblies and reactor core material distributions. Thus, it is used as a base methodology to evaluate neutronics variables of the research reactor at the University of Utah. With its much shorter computation time than MCNP6, AGENT provides agreement with the MCNP6 within a 0.5 % difference for the eigenvalue and a maximum difference of 10% in the power peaking factor values. Differential and integral control rod worths obtained by AGENT show well agreement with MCNP6 and the theoretical model. However, regulating the control rod worth is somewhat overestimated by both MCNP6 and AGENT models when compared to the experimental/theoretical values. In comparison to MCNP6, the total control rod worths and shutdown margin obtained with AGENT show better agreement to the experimental values.
机译:犹他大学研究堆(100 kW TRIGA Mark I)中三个​​控制棒的控制棒反应性(价值)和燃料棒功率峰值因子使用AGENT代码系统进行了表征,并描述了本文的结果。将这些值与MCNP6和现有的实验测量值进行比较。另外,分析并讨论了特征值,中子空间通量分布和反应速率。 AGENT代码系统在各种几何形状的反应堆组件和反应堆堆芯材料分布方面,为各种反应堆类型和复杂性提供了广泛的基准。因此,它被用作评估犹他大学研究堆中子变量的基础方法。由于其计算时间比MCNP6短得多,因此AGENT与MCNP6的特征值之差为0.5%,功率峰值因子值之差最大为10%。通过AGENT获得的差速器和积分控制杆值与MCNP6和理论模型吻合良好。但是,与实验/理论值相比,MCNP6和AGENT模型都高估了调节控制杆的价值。与MCNP6相比,使用AGENT获得的总控制杆价值和停机裕度与实验值显示出更好的一致性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号