【24h】

2种灭菌器在消毒供应中心的应用比较

机译:2种灭菌器在消毒供应中心的应用比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Abstract:Objective To compare the application of two kinds of low temperature sterilizers in central sterile supply department(CSSD). Methods A total of 300 sterilization packages randomly selected in CSSD were divided into group A and group B, with 150 sterilization packages in each group. The hydrogen peroxide plasma and ethylene oxide low temperature sterilization were used into group A and group B, respectively. The sterilization effect, costs and sterilization time of the two groups were compared. Results Both group A and B can conform to the requirements of the sterilization, with a 100% of eligible sterilization rate. In group A, the sterilization time was 55 minutes and cost of each packs was 73.16 RMB. In group B, the sterilization time was 18 h and cost of each packs was 17.58 RMB. Conclusion The sterilization time of Forhydrogen peroxide low temperature plasma sterilizer is comparatively shorter and cavity is relatively smaller, which makes it more suitable for emergent sterilization of surgical instruments. While ethylene oxide sterilization have longer process time and larger cavity, which makes it suitable for items with relatively slow sterilization cycle.
机译:摘要:目的比较两种低温灭菌器在中央无菌供应部门的应用。方法将随机抽取的CSSD消毒包装300份分为A组和B组,每组150个。将过氧化氢等离子体和环氧乙烷低温灭菌分别用于A组和B组。比较两组的杀菌效果,成本和杀菌时间。结果A组和B组均符合灭菌要求,合格率达到100%。 A组消毒时间为55分钟,每包成本为73.16元。 B组灭菌时间为18 h,每包成本为17.58元。结论过氧化氢低温等离子体灭菌器的灭菌时间相对较短,腔体相对较小,更适合于外科器械的紧急灭菌。尽管环氧乙烷灭菌具有更长的处理时间和更大的空腔,这使其适用于灭菌周期相对较慢的物品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号