首页> 外文期刊>New Zealand journal of agricultural research >Comparison of methods of preparing grass and silage samples for laboratory analysis
【24h】

Comparison of methods of preparing grass and silage samples for laboratory analysis

机译:用于实验室分析的草料和青贮饲料样品制备方法的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract The effects on the estimated chemical composition of grass and silage of various methods of preparing samples for analysis were studied. The methods used for grass were: (1) oven drying and grinding, (2) freeze drying and grinding, (3) coring, (4) mincing, and (5) freezing and sawing; and for silages: (1) freezing and sawing, (2) mincing, (3) slicing with a bacon slicer once or twice, and (4) chopping with a hand guillotine. Oven drying of grasses gave lowest values for dry matter (DM), soluble carbohydrate, and total N, but method of preparation had no effect on ash % or fibre %. DM and fibre contents of silages were highest in minced and frozen-sawn samples, but method of preparation had no significant effect on values for VFA, lactic acid, and ammonia.
机译:摘要研究了各种制备样品的方法对估计的草和青贮饲料化学成分的影响。用于草的方法是:(1)烤箱干燥和研磨,(2)冷冻干燥和研磨,(3)取芯,(4)切碎,(5)冷冻和锯切;对于青贮饲料:(1)冷冻和锯切,(2)切碎,(3)用培根切片机切成一两次,(4)用手工切刀切碎。烤箱的干燥使干物质(DM),可溶性碳水化合物和总氮的值最低,但制备方法对灰分或纤维%没有影响。切碎和冷冻锯切的样品中干物质和干物质的干物质含量最高,但是制备方法对VFA,乳酸和氨的值没有显着影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号