...
首页> 外文期刊>Nutrition Journal >Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimens
【24h】

Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimens

机译:用于粪便标本中人肠道微生物群落PCR-DGGE分析的DNA提取试剂盒的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The influence of diet on intestinal microflora has been investigated mainly using conventional microbiological approaches. Although these studies have advanced knowledge on human intestinal microflora, it is imperative that new methods are applied to facilitate scientific progress. Culture-independent molecular fingerprinting method of Polymerase Chain Reaction and Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) has been used to study microbial communities in a variety of environmental samples. However, these protocols must be optimized prior to their application in order to enhance the quality and accuracy of downstream analyses. In this study, the relative efficacy of four commercial DNA extraction kits (Mobio Ultra Clean? Fecal DNA Isolation Kit, M; QIAamp? DNA Stool Mini Kit, Q; FastDNA? SPIN Kit, FSp; FastDNA? SPIN Kit for Soil, FSo) were evaluated. Further, PCR-DGGE technique was also assessed for its feasibility in detecting differences in human intestinal bacterial fingerprint profiles. Method Total DNA was extracted from varying weights of human fecal specimens using four different kits, followed by PCR amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes, and DGGE separation of the amplicons. Results Regardless of kit, maximum DNA yield was obtained using 10 to 50 mg (wet wt) of fecal specimens and similar DGGE profiles were obtained. However, kits FSp and FSo extracted significantly larger amounts of DNA per g dry fecal specimens and produced more bands on their DGGE profiles than kits M and Q due to their use of bead-containing lysing matrix and vigorous shaking step. DGGE of 16S rRNA gene PCR products was suitable for capturing the profiles of human intestinal microbial community and enabled rapid comparative assessment of inter- and intra-subject differences. Conclusion We conclude that extraction kits that incorporated bead-containing lysing matrix and vigorous shaking produced high quality DNA from human fecal specimens (10 to 50 mg, wet wt) that can be resolved as bacterial community fingerprints using PCR-DGGE technique. Subsequently, PCR-DGGE technique can be applied for studying variations in human intestinal microbial communities.
机译:背景技术主要通过常规的微生物学方法研究了饮食对肠道菌群的影响。尽管这些研究对人的肠道菌群都有很深的了解,但必须应用新的方法促进科学进步。聚合酶链反应和变性梯度凝胶电泳(PCR-DGGE)的不依赖培养的分子指纹分析方法已用于研究多种环境样品中的微生物群落。但是,必须在应用这些协议之前对其进行优化,以提高下游分析的质量和准确性。在这项研究中,四种商用DNA提取试剂盒(Mobio Ultra Clean™粪便DNA分离试剂盒,M;QIAamp®DNA Stool Mini试剂盒,Q;FastDNA®SPIN试剂盒,FSp;FastDNA®SPIN试剂盒,土壤)的相对功效。被评估。此外,还评估了PCR-DGGE技术在检测人肠道细菌指纹图谱差异方面的可行性。方法使用四种不同的试剂盒从不同重量的人类粪便样本中提取总DNA,然后对细菌16S rRNA基因进行PCR扩增,并对扩增子进行DGGE分离。结果无论使用何种试剂盒,使用10至50 mg(湿重)粪便样品均可获得最大的DNA产量,并获得相似的DGGE谱图。但是,由于试剂盒FSp和FSo使用含珠的裂解基质和剧烈摇动步骤,因此每克干粪便样品提取的DNA量明显多于试剂盒M和Q,从而在DGGE谱上产生更多的条带。 DGGE的16S rRNA基因PCR产品适用于捕获人类肠道微生物群落的概况,并能够快速比较评估受试者之间和受试者之间的差异。结论我们得出的结论是,提取试剂盒结合了含珠的裂解基质并剧烈振摇,可从人粪便样本(10至50 mg,湿重)中产生高质量的DNA,可使用PCR-DGGE技术将其解析为细菌群落指纹。随后,PCR-DGGE技术可用于研究人类肠道微生物群落的变异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号