首页> 外文期刊>Nursing of intrgrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine(Zhong-Xiyi Jiehe Huli ) >气压止血带充气前两种不同驱血方法的对比研究
【24h】

气压止血带充气前两种不同驱血方法的对比研究

机译:气压止血带充气前两种不同驱血方法的对比研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Abstract:Objective To compare the effect of two different blood-evacuation methods before inflation of pneumatic tourniquet. Methods 〓Totally 100 patients withlower extremity surgery were assigned to the control group(n=50)and the observation group(n=50)according to the different blood-evacuation methods. The rubber strap was used before inflation of pneumatic tourniquet in the control group, and the manual squeezing method was adopted in the observation group. The duration of blood-evacuation,efficacy of blood-evacuation and related complications were observed and compared between two groups. Results 〓The duration of blood-evacuation in the observation group was shorter than that of the controls(4.32±1.70 min vs.5.45±2.82 min, P0.05). There was no significant difference in efficacy of blood-evacuation between two groups(P0.05). Patients in the observation group had a lower severity of related complications(P0.05). Conclusion 〓Manual squeezing method is an safety and effective blood-evacuation method before inflation of pneumatic tourniquet.
机译:摘要:目的比较充气止血带充气前两种抽血方法的效果。方法〓根据不同的抽血方法,将100例下肢手术患者分别分为对照组(n = 50)和观察组(n = 50)。对照组在充气止血带充气之前使用橡皮带,观察组采用手动挤压方法。观察两组患者的抽血时间,抽血效率及相关并发症。结果〓观察组的抽血时间短于对照组(4.32±1.70 min vs.5.45±2.82 min,P <0.05)。两组的抽血疗效无明显差异(P> 0.05)。观察组患者相关并发症的严重程度较低(P <0.05)。结论〓手动挤压是一种安全,有效的充气止血带充气方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号