首页> 外文期刊>New Media and Mass Communication >Federalism and Management of Diversity: A Brief Account of Ethiopian Experience
【24h】

Federalism and Management of Diversity: A Brief Account of Ethiopian Experience

机译:联邦制与多样性管理:埃塞俄比亚经验简述

获取原文
           

摘要

Based on the existing situation with regard to management of diversity, some federations may adopt multi-level system of authority and governance; and others may incline towards centralized governance. However, it is believed that Federation's capacity to manage ethnic diversity varies across its functions and distinct features. Accordingly Ethiopia having planned to accommodate diversity and to address the question of nationalities in the country opted to adopt federalism as the best way. It is believed that federalism is a system of government which allows decentralization of decision making power to down tires of government with the intention to enhance the participation of local communities there by to address the need of diversified groups.To achieve its objectives the establishment of institutional structure of the federation has been realized. However, the way these institutions have channeled to the activities of the electorate, political parties, organized interest groups, bureaucracies, and informal elites and the operational realities on the ground with regard to the way the federal system is managed has contributed to the accentuation of ethnic conflict rather than managing the diversity. After the adoption of ethnic federalism in 1991, there were many massive massacres and persecutions. The contemporary crises in different parts of Ethiopia seem to be attributable to the above dilemmas. Therefore, the general trend in the implementation of the ethnic federalism after its establishment shows that, “Ethiopia remains hindered in ethnic strife” and contrary to the very problem it was intended to resolve, and it seems to have contributed more problems than it set to solve (Gudina, 2007; Haile, 1996; Maru, 2010). Based on these facts, one can conclude that the implementation of ethnic federalism in Ethiopia is remained problematic and ineffective and it seems “a fragile and perilous experiment” that puts a big challenge on management of diversity in the country.
机译:根据有关多样性管理的现状,某些联合会可能会采用多层次的权限和治理系统;其他可能会倾向于集中治理。但是,据信,联邦管理种族多样性的能力因其职能和特点而异。因此,埃塞俄比亚计划容纳多样性并解决该国的民族问题,因此选择采用联邦制为最佳方式。人们认为,联邦制是一种政府体制,它允许权力下放来分散决策权,以减轻政府的负担,从而通过解决多样化群体的需求来增强当地社区的参与度。联盟的结构已经实现。但是,这些机构将其引导至选民,政党,有组织的利益集团,官僚机构和非正式精英的活动的方式,以及有关联邦系统管理方式的当地实际操作,都促进了联邦政府的重视。种族冲突,而不是管理多元化。 1991年采用族裔联邦制之后,发生了许多大规模的屠杀和迫害。埃塞俄比亚各地的当代危机似乎可归因于上述困境。因此,建立民族联邦制后的总体趋势表明,“埃塞俄比亚仍然受到民族冲突的阻碍”,这与原本打算解决的问题相反,而且似乎带来了比原先要解决的问题更多的问题。解决(Gudina,2007; Haile,1996; Maru,2010)。基于这些事实,可以得出结论,埃塞俄比亚实行种族联邦制仍然是有问题和无效的,似乎是“脆弱而危险的实验”,给该国的多样性管理带来了巨大挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号