首页> 外文期刊>New Media and Mass Communication >Development and Journalism Composite in the Media Landscape: A Critical Assessment of the Private and Government Media Journalists’ Perception Towards Development Journalism
【24h】

Development and Journalism Composite in the Media Landscape: A Critical Assessment of the Private and Government Media Journalists’ Perception Towards Development Journalism

机译:媒体领域的发展与新闻综合:对私人和政府媒体记者对发展新闻的感知的批判性评估

获取原文
       

摘要

The central focus of this study has been assessing the perception of private and government journalists towards development journalism. It inquires how they understood and explain the ideology. And it has attempted to investigate the visible and invisible gaps and the resultant perception effect between development journalism theoretical framework by journalists and the actual application of it? To do so, individual in-depth interview, Focus Group Discussion and document analysis were used to generate data to the study. Major literatures have been consulted and the following key points are included; surfacing of development journalism, conceptual components, and Key components of development journalism, Contextual origins, Theoretical bases of development journalism, Development journalism and its watch dog role, School of thought of DJ, Purpose of development reporting , Objectives of development journalism, Principles of development journalism, Development journalism defined, Development news defined, Implementing development journalism, and The concept of DJ in Africa.The finding shows that there is a closer outlook between the state and private media journalists concerning the concept of development, their responses vis a vis with the multilateral view of scholars show that there still is a limitation in understanding the notion fully and meaningfully. Majority of the research participants tended to capitalize the economic interpretation of the concept and some private journalists the political meaning of it and on a collective view, the social, cultural, traditional……Aspect of the concept is disregarded. As outlined over and above having a sound meaning of development is imperative in owning the right virtues of DJ. Given the above fact, the views of the journalists are not all encompassing and touching the basic meaning of the concept of development.As for development journalism, the outcome revealed that the understanding the journalists, particularly the private ones, is somehow limited. They defined it in a very narrow angle. Relatively, the government journalists seem to have a better understanding of the concept. However, there definitely is a limitation in their understanding and explanation. As literatures show, the concept of DJ is far more comprehensive and deeper than explained by the journalists.In assessing the Factors contributing to the negative perception of the ideology; fundamentally, the journalists who took part in the discussion, equivocally, agreed that the ideology in its full sense and meaning is not put into practice. In unearthing the factors that tangle the implementation of the ideology, the participants identified the following restraining factors. And they are; Self-Censorship, The Problem of Editorial Independence, Lack of proper awareness about the ideology, Direct and in-direct outside influences, Following up-bottom approach, The tradition of poor research among journalists, Politicizing the ideology, Very poor or sluggish assessment of the impact of the ideology, The ideology is not well institutionalized, and Low self-concept as a professional journalist.As per the theoretical discussions and the findings of the research, recommendations have been forwarded and one of it is. A development journalist should critically examine, evaluate and report the relevance of a development project to national and local needs, the difference between its impacts on people as claimed by the government officials and as it actually is. Thus, the government media journalists should adjust their mind set towards the right meaning and more importantly, the application of the ideology. The private media journalists too should widen their view concerning the ideology since it is a professional obligation to understand professional issues.
机译:这项研究的重点一直在评估私人和政府新闻工作者对发展新闻的看法。它询问他们如何理解和解释意识形态。并且它试图研究记者在发展新闻理论框架与实际应用之间的可见和不可见的差距以及由此产生的知觉效果?为此,使用了个人深入访谈,焦点小组讨论和文档分析来生成研究数据。参考了主要文献,包括以下要点;发展新闻学的概念,构成要素和发展新闻学的主要组成部分,背景渊源,发展新闻学的理论基础,发展新闻学及其看门狗的作用,DJ思想学院,发展报告的目的,发展新闻学的目标,原则发展新闻业,发展新闻业,发展新闻业,发展新闻业和非洲DJ概念的发现表明,国家和私人媒体记者对发展理念的看法更加密切,他们对发展的看法学者们的多边观点表明,充分,有意义地理解这一概念仍然存在局限性。大多数研究参与者倾向于将对该概念的经济解释资本化,而一些私人记者则倾向于将该概念的政治含义资本化,并且从集体的观点来看,社会,文化,传统……的概念都被忽略了。如上所述,拥有正确的发展意义是拥有DJ正确美德的必要。鉴于上述事实,记者的观点并没有全部包含并触及发展概念的基本含义。关于发展新闻,结果表明,对记者,尤其是私人记者的理解受到了某种限制。他们以非常狭窄的角度定义了它。相对而言,政府新闻工作者似乎对该概念有更好的理解。但是,它们的理解和解释肯定有局限性。正如文献所显示的,DJ的概念比新闻工作者所解释的更加全面和深入。从根本上讲,参加讨论的新闻工作者毫不含糊地同意,没有将其完整意义上的意识形态付诸实践。在发掘影响意识形态实施的因素时,参与者确定了以下制约因素。他们是;自我审查,编辑独立性问题,对意识形态缺乏适当的意识,直接和间接的外部影响,自下而上的方法,记者中研究不佳的传统,将意识形态政治化,对评估的评估很差或缓慢意识形态的制度化程度不高,作为专业记者的自我观念低。根据理论讨论和研究发现,提出了建议,其中之一是。发展记者应认真审查,评估和报告发展项目与国家和地方需求的相关性,以及政府官员声称的对人们的影响与实际影响之间的差异。因此,政府媒体记者应该将他们的思维方式调整为正确的含义,更重要的是,将其调整为意识形态的应用。私人媒体记者也应该扩大对意识形态的看法,因为理解专业问题是一项职业义务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号