...
首页> 外文期刊>Kidney Research and Clinical Practice >PROTEIN CATABOLIC RATE SHOULD BE NORMALIZED BY IDEAL BODY WEIGHT NOT BY POST-DIALYSIS BODY WEIGHT.
【24h】

PROTEIN CATABOLIC RATE SHOULD BE NORMALIZED BY IDEAL BODY WEIGHT NOT BY POST-DIALYSIS BODY WEIGHT.

机译:蛋白质分解代谢率应通过理想的身体重量进行标准化,而不是通过透析后的身体重量进行标准化。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Protein catabolic rate (PCR) is calculated by urea kinetic model thorough the dialysis session and it is recognized as expressing the protein intake in the steady state of dialysis patients. PCR is generally normalized by post-dialysis body weight (BW), expressed as nPCR, however, most dietary guidelines for protein intake are documented as PCR normalized by ideal BW (iPCR). We evaluated which is better nPCR or iPCR to estimate the impact on the patient survival and to use it for dietary education for dialysis patients. 119 chronic dialysis patients whose dialysis vintages were longer than 3 years were selected into this study. The mean age of them was 62.4years old and the mean dialysis vintage was 115.4 months. The patients were divided into 4 groups by each PCR value as less than 0.7, 0.7- 0.9, 0.9-1.1, greater than 1.1g/Kg/day. Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted to evaluate the 5-year patient survival in each PCR method. The difference in the patient survival between 4 groups in each PCR method was evaluated by Log-rank test. Among 119 patients 30 patients died and 9 patients were censored out, and the overall 5-year survival rate was 74.4%. There were no significant differences between 4 groups in nPCR. However, a significant risk in the group less than 0.7g/Kg/day and a significant benefit in the group greater than 1.1g/Kg/day were observed in iPCR. Both nPCR and iPCR were not independent significant risk factor on the patient survival. Only age and the serum level of CRP were significant risk factor. We concluded the PCR should be normalized by ideal BW not by post-dialysis BW.
机译:通过尿素动力学模型在整个透析过程中计算蛋白质分解代谢率(PCR),该蛋白质分解代谢率被认为是表达透析患者稳定状态下的蛋白质摄入量。 PCR通常通过透析后体重(BW)进行标准化,表示为nPCR,但是,大多数饮食摄入蛋白质的指南均记录为通过理想BW(iPCR)进行标准化的PCR。我们评估了哪种更好的nPCR或iPCR来评估对患者生存的影响,并将其用于透析患者的饮食教育。本研究选择了119名透析时间超过3年的慢性透析患者。他们的平均年龄为62.4岁,平均透析期为115.4个月。根据每个PCR值将患者分为4组,分别为小于0.7、0.7-0.9、0.9-1.1,大于1.1g / Kg /天。进行Kaplan-Meier分析以评估每种PCR方法的5年患者生存率。通过Log-rank检验评估每种PCR方法中4组患者存活率的差异。在119例患者中,有30例死亡,有9例被检查,总的5年生存率为74.4%。 nPCR中4组之间无显着差异。但是,在iPCR中观察到该组的显着风险低于0.7g / Kg /天,而该组的显着益处则高于1.1g / Kg /天。 nPCR和iPCR都不是影响患者生存的独立重要危险因素。仅年龄和血清CRP水平是重要的危险因素。我们得出结论,PCR应该通过理想的体重标准化,而不是通过透析后体重标准化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号