首页> 外文期刊>Neurosurgical focus >Accuracy of intraoperative computed tomography image-guided surgery in placing pedicle and pelvic screws for primary versus revision spine surgery
【24h】

Accuracy of intraoperative computed tomography image-guided surgery in placing pedicle and pelvic screws for primary versus revision spine surgery

机译:术中计算机断层扫描图像引导手术在放置椎弓根和骨盆螺钉中的准确性

获取原文
           

摘要

Object Revision spine surgery, which is challenging due to disrupted anatomy, poor fluoroscopic imaging, and altered tactile feedback, may benefit from CT image-guided surgery (CT-IGS). This study evaluates accuracy of CT-IGS–navigated screws in primary versus revision spine surgery. Methods Pedicle and pelvic screws placed with the O-arm in 28 primary (313 screws) and 33 revision (429 screws) cases in which institutional postoperative CT scans were available were retrospectively reviewed for placement accuracy. Screw accuracy was categorized as 1) good ( 3-mm breach). Results Use of CT-IGS resulted in high rates of good or fair screws for both primary (98.7%) and revision (98.6%) cases. Rates of good or fair screws were comparable for the following regions: C7–T3 at 100% (good or fair) in primary versus 100% (good or fair) in revision; T4–9 at 96.8% versus 100%; T10–L2 at 98.2% versus 99.3%; L3–5 at 100% versus 99.2%; and pelvis at 98.7% versus 98.6%, respectively. On the other hand, revision sacral screws had statistically significantly lower rates of good placement compared with primary (100% primary vs 80.6% revision, p = 0.027). Of these revision sacral screws, 11.1% had poor placement, with bicortical screws extending > 3 mm beyond the anterior cortex. Revision pelvic screws demonstrated the highest rate of fair placement (28%), with the mode of medial breach in all cases directed into the sacral-iliac joint. Conclusions In the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine, CT-IGS demonstrated comparable accuracy rates for both primary and revision spine surgery. Use of 3D imaging of the bony pedicle anatomy appears to be sufficient for the spine surgeon to overcome the difficulties associated with instrumentation in revision cases. Although the bony structures of sacral pedicles and pelvis are relatively larger, the complexity of local anatomy was not overcome with CT-IGS, and an increased trend toward inaccurate screw placement was demonstrated.
机译:由于解剖结构破坏,透视图像质量差和触觉反馈改变而引起的Object Revision脊柱手术可能会受益于CT图像引导手术(CT-IGS)。这项研究评估了CT-IGS导航螺钉在原发与翻修脊柱手术中的准确性。方法回顾性分析28例原发(313枚螺钉)和33例翻修(429枚螺钉)的病例,这些病例在可以进行机构术后CT扫描的情况下,使用O型臂放置椎弓根和骨盆螺钉,以评估其放置的准确性。螺丝精度分类为1)好(3毫米缺口)。结果CT-IGS的使用使原发病例(98.7%)和翻修病例(98.6%)的良性或良性螺钉率较高。以下区域的合格或合格螺钉比率可比:C7–T3初级版本为100%(合格或中等),修订版为100%(合格或中等); T4–9为96.8%,而100%; T10–L2分别为98.2%和99.3%; L3–5的比例为99.2%,为100%;和骨盆分别为98.7%和98.6%。另一方面,与primary骨相比,revision骨revision骨螺钉的良好放置率在统计学上显着较低(100%vs骨与80.6%revision骨,p = 0.027)。在这些revision骨翻修螺钉中,有11.1%的位置不佳,双皮质螺钉延伸超过前皮质3 mm以上。修订的骨盆螺钉显示出最高的公平放置率(28%),在所有情况下,内侧裂开的方式均指向into--关节。结论在颈椎,胸椎和腰椎中,CT-IGS在初次和翻修脊柱手术中显示出可比的准确率。骨蒂解剖学的3D成像似乎足以使脊柱外科医生克服翻修病例中与器械相关的困难。尽管of骨蒂和骨盆的骨结构相对较大,但CT-IGS不能克服局部解剖的复杂性,并且显示出螺钉放置不正确的趋势有所增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号