...
首页> 外文期刊>Neurospine. >Comparison of Operating Time between Stand-alone Cage and a Standard Method for a Single Level Cervical Disc Disease
【24h】

Comparison of Operating Time between Stand-alone Cage and a Standard Method for a Single Level Cervical Disc Disease

机译:单笼型颈椎病标准方法与独立笼式手术时间的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective Autologous bone graft with anterior plating had been a standard method for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Drawbacks of a standard method were donor site problem and problem associated with anterior plate. The stand-alone cage was introduced to reduce such problems. However, problems associated with subsidence and local kyphosis at the index level (segmental kyphosis) still persist with stand-alone cage and a standard method would be required in some cases. It seems that harvest of autologous bone and anterior plating procedure is time consuming, but this has not been verified. The aim of this study was to compare the operating time between patients operated on with stand-alone cage versus a standard method for single-level cervical disc disease. Methods Consecutive 29 patients (M:F=18:11; mean age, 58.4±12.4 years), who had undergone ACDF for single-level disc disease by a single surgeon from incision to closure during 2009-2011, were selected for this retrospective study. Seventeen patients were operated with stand-alone cage (Group I), and twelve patients were with a standard method (Group II). Operating time (from incision to closure), estimated blood loss, clinical and radiological outcomes were compared. Follow-up period was 11.4±6.3 months. Results Operating time was not different between groups longer; Group I (96.1±28.7 minutes) and Group II (112.4±31.7 minutes) (p=0.13). There was no surgery related complication. Excellent or good outcome was achieved in 11 and 10 patients of group I and II, respectively. Bony fusion was achieved in 15 and 10 patients of group I and II respectively, while one subsidence occurred in each group. Postoperative segmental angle at the index level and cervical curvature was not different between groups. No patient complained donor site pain at the last follow-up. Conclusions ACDF with a standard method for single-level cervical disc disease was not a time-consuming procedure comparing stand-alone cage.
机译:目的自体前路自体植骨是颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)的标准方法。标准方法的缺点是供体部位问题和前板相关问题。引入了独立式笼子以减少此类问题。但是,在单独的笼子中,与下陷和局部水平的后凸畸形(节段性后凸畸形)相关的问题仍然存在,在某些情况下仍需要标准方法。似乎自体骨的收获和前路电镀术很费时,但这尚未得到证实。这项研究的目的是比较单笼颈椎间盘疾病患者的手术时间和标准方法。方法回顾性分析2009-2011年间由单名外科医生从切口到闭合的单层椎间盘疾病行ACDF的29例患者(男:F = 18:11;平均年龄58.4±12.4岁)。研究。 17例患者采用独立笼进行手术(I组),而12例采用标准方法进行手术(II组)。比较手术时间(从切口到闭合),估计失血量,临床和放射学结果。随访时间11.4±6.3个月。结果两组手术时间无差异。第一组(96.1±28.7分钟)和第二组(112.4±31.7分钟)(p = 0.13)。没有手术相关的并发症。第一组和第二组分别有11位和10位患者获得了优异或良好的结果。 I组和II组分别有15例和10例患者发生了骨融合,而每组均发生了一个下沉。两组的指标水平和节段曲度在术后节段角上无差异。在最后一次随访中,没有患者抱怨供体部位疼痛。结论ACDF采用标准方法治疗单级宫颈椎间盘疾病不是比较独立笼子的耗时程序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号