...
首页> 外文期刊>Neurospine. >Comparison of Treatment Methods in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis for Geriatric Patient: Nerve Block Versus Radiofrequency Neurotomy Versus Spinal Surgery
【24h】

Comparison of Treatment Methods in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis for Geriatric Patient: Nerve Block Versus Radiofrequency Neurotomy Versus Spinal Surgery

机译:老年患者腰椎管狭窄症治疗方法的比较:神经阻滞与射频神经切开术与脊柱外科

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective The incidence of spinal treatment, including nerve block, radiofrequency neurotomy, instrumented fusions, is increasing, and progressively involves patients of age 65 and older. Treatment of the geriatric patients is often a difficult challenge for the spine surgeon. General health, sociofamilial and mental condition of the patients as well as the treatment techniques and postoperative management are to be accurately evaluated and planned. We tried to compare three treatment methods of spinal stenosis for geriatric patient in single institution. Methods The cases of treatment methods in spinal stenosis over than 65 years old were analyzed. The numbers of patients were 371 underwent nerve block, radiofrequency neurotomy, instrumented fusions from January 2009 to December 2012 (nerve block: 253, radiofrequency neurotomy: 56, instrumented fusions: 62). The authors reviewed medical records, operative findings and postoperative clinical results, retrospectively. Simple X-ray were evaluated and clinical outcome was measured by Odom's criteria at 1 month after procedures. Results We were observed excellent and good results in 162 (64%) patients with nerve block, 40 (71%) patient with radIofrequency neurotomy, 46 (74%) patient with spinal surgery. Poor results were 20 (8%) patients in nerve block, 2 (3%) patients in radiofrequency neurotomy, 3 (5%) patient in spinal surgery. Conclusion We reviewed literatures and analyzed three treatment methods of spinal stenosis for geriatric patients. Although the long term outcome of surgical treatment was most favorable, radiofrequency neurotomy and nerve block can be considered for the secondary management of elderly lumbar spinals stenosis patients.
机译:目的脊柱治疗(包括神经阻滞,射频神经切开术,器械融合术)的发生率正在增加,并逐渐涉及65岁以上的患者。对于脊柱外科医生而言,对老年患者的治疗通常是困难的挑战。应准确评估和计划患者的总体健康状况,家族性和精神状态以及治疗技术和术后管理。我们试图比较单一机构中老年患者脊柱狭窄的三种治疗方法。方法分析65岁以上脊柱狭窄的治疗方法。从2009年1月至2012年12月,共有371例患者接受了神经阻滞,射频神经切开术,器械融合治疗(神经传导阻滞:253,射频神经切开术:56,器械融合术:62)。作者回顾性地回顾了病历,手术结果和术后临床结果。术后1个月评估简单的X射线并按照Odom的标准测量临床结局。结果我们在162例(64%)的神经阻滞患者,40例(71%)的射频神经切开术患者,46例(74%)的脊柱外科手术患者中观察到了良好的效果。结果差的是20例(8%)神经阻滞患者,2例(3%)射频神经切开术,3例(5%)脊柱手术患者。结论我们回顾了文献并分析了老年患者脊椎狭窄的三种治疗方法。尽管手术治疗的长期结果是最有利的,但是射频神经切开术和神经阻滞可以考虑用于老年腰椎管狭窄患者的二级治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号