首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment >The effects of psychoeducational family intervention on coping strategies of relatives of patients with bipolar I disorder: results from a controlled, real-world, multicentric study
【24h】

The effects of psychoeducational family intervention on coping strategies of relatives of patients with bipolar I disorder: results from a controlled, real-world, multicentric study

机译:心理教育家庭干预对双相I型障碍患者亲属应对策略的影响:一项来自受控,现实世界,多中心研究的结果

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Psychoeducational family intervention (PFI) has been proven to be effective in improving the levels of family burden and patients’ personal functioning in schizophrenia and bipolar disorders (BDs). Less is known about the impact of PFI on relatives’ coping strategies in BD. Methods: A multicenter, controlled, outpatient trial funded by the Italian Ministry of Health and coordinated by the Department of Psychiatry of the University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli” has been conducted in patients with bipolar I disorder (BD-I) and their key relatives consecutively recruited in 11 randomly selected Italian community mental health centers. We aim to test the hypothesis that PFI improves problem-oriented coping strategies in relatives of BD-I patients compared to the Treatment As Usual (TAU) group. Results: The final sample was constituted of 123 patients and 139 relatives. At baseline assessment (T0), the vast majority of relatives already adopted problem-oriented coping strategies more frequently than the emotion-focused ones. At the end of the intervention, relatives receiving PFI reported a higher endorsement of adaptive coping strategies, such as “maintenance of social interests” (odds ratio [OR]=0.309, CI=0.04–0.57; p =0.023), “positive communication with the patient” (OR=0.295, CI=0.13–0.46; p =0.001), and “searching for information” (OR=0.443, CI=0.12–0.76; p =0.007), compared to TAU relatives, after controlling for several confounders. As regards the emotion-focused coping strategies, relatives receiving the experimental intervention less frequently reported to adopt “resignation” (OR=-0.380, CI=-0.68 to -0.08; p =0.014) and “coercion” (OR=-0.268, CI=-0.46 to -0.08; p =0.006) strategies, compared to TAU relatives. Conclusion: PFI is effective in improving the adaptive coping strategies of relatives of BD-I patients, but further studies are needed for evaluating the long-term benefits of this intervention.
机译:背景:心理教育家庭干预(PFI)已被证明可有效改善精神分裂症和躁郁症(BDs)的家庭负担水平和患者的个人功能。关于PFI对BD亲属应对策略的影响知之甚少。方法:由意大利卫生部资助并由坎帕尼亚大学精神病学系“ Luigi Vanvitelli”协调的多中心对照门诊试验已在双相I型障碍(BD-I)患者及其主要亲属中进行在11个随机选择的意大利社区精神卫生中心连续招募。我们的目的是检验以下假设:与常规治疗(TAU)组相比,PFI改善了BD-1患者亲属的以问题为导向的应对策略。结果:最终样本由123名患者和139名亲属组成。在基线评估(T0)时,绝大多数亲戚已经比以情感为中心的人更频繁地采用了以问题为导向的应对策略。在干预结束时,接受PFI的亲属表示对适应性应对策略的认可更高,例如“维持社会利益”(优势比[OR] = 0.309,CI = 0.04-0.57; p = 0.023),“积极沟通”。与患者相比”(OR = 0.295,CI = 0.13–0.46; p = 0.001),以及“寻找信息”(OR = 0.443,CI = 0.12–0.76; p = 0.007),与TAU亲属相比,几个混杂因素。至于以情绪为中心的应对策略,接受实验干预的亲戚较少报道其采取“辞职”(OR = -0.380,CI = -0.68至-0.08; p = 0.014)和“胁迫”(OR = -0.268,与TAU亲戚相比,CI = -0.46至-0.08; p = 0.006)策略。结论:PFI在改善BD-I患者亲属的适应性应对策略方面是有效的,但是需要进一步的研究来评估这种干预的长期益处。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号