首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment >Quality and utilization of the Finnish clinical practice guideline in schizophrenia: evaluation using AGREE II and the vignette approach
【24h】

Quality and utilization of the Finnish clinical practice guideline in schizophrenia: evaluation using AGREE II and the vignette approach

机译:芬兰精神分裂症临床实践指南的质量和利用率:使用AGREE II和小插图方法进行评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the quality of the Finnish clinical practice guideline related to schizophrenia care and how it can be utilized in psychiatric services. Participants and methods: The data were collected from one psychiatric ward and seven psychiatric outpatient units situated in two cities in Southern Finland. A total of 49 professionals working in these sites participated in this study. A descriptive study design was adopted. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument with six domains including 23 items was used to assess the quality of the guideline, whereas a vignette was implemented to describe how staff would use the guideline in hypothetical cases in daily practice. The analysis of AGREE II was based on rating each of the 23 items on a seven-point scale and calculating a quality score for the six domains. To describe the utilization of the guideline, eight key recommendations of the guideline were deductively rated out of the respondents’ answers. Results: The results showed that the “scope and purpose” of the guideline were well described, but “applicability” was insufficient. The overall quality of the guideline was high (73%). Almost one fifth of the respondents were in agreement with key recommendations. Conclusion: The overall quality of Guideline for Schizophrenia was good, but its “applicability” and utilization should be improved.
机译:目的:本研究旨在评估与精神分裂症护理有关的芬兰临床实践指南的质量,以及如何将其用于精神病学服务。参与者和方法:数据收集自位于芬兰南部两个城市的一个精神病房和七个精神病门诊。在这些站点中总共有49位专业人员参加了这项研究。采用描述性研究设计。 《研究与评价指南II评估》(AGREE II)具有六个领域,包括23个项目,用于评估指南的质量,而插图则用来描述员工在日常实践中如何在假设情况下使用该指南。 AGREE II的分析基于对23个项目中的每一个进行7分制评分并计算6个领域的质量得分。为了描述该指南的使用情况,从受访者的答案中扣除了该指南的八项主要建议。结果:结果表明,指南的“范围和目的”得到了很好的描述,但“适用性”不足。该指南的总体质量很高(73%)。几乎五分之一的受访者同意主要建议。结论:《精神分裂症指南》的总体质量良好,但其“适用性”和利用率应提高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号