首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment >Biological differences between melancholic and nonmelancholic depression subtyped by the CORE measure
【24h】

Biological differences between melancholic and nonmelancholic depression subtyped by the CORE measure

机译:通过CORE测度分型的忧郁症和非忧郁症抑郁之间的生物学差异

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare melancholic patients rated by the CORE measure of observable psychomotor disturbance with nonmelancholic and control subjects across a set of biomarkers.Methods: Depressed patients were classified as melancholic or nonmelancholic by using the CORE measure. Both groups of patients, as well as control subjects, were compared for a set of clinical and laboratory measures. Serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor, of two markers of oxidative stress (protein carbonyl content [PCC] and thiobarbituric acid reactive?substances [TBARS]), and of several immunity markers (interleukin [IL]-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and interferon-gamma) were analyzed. Results: Thirty-three depressed patients and 54 healthy controls were studied. Depressive patients showed higher IL-4, IL-6, and PCC values than healthy controls. Thirteen (39%) of the depressed patients were assigned as melancholic by the CORE measure. They generated lower interferon-gamma (compared with nonmelancholic depressed patients) and TBARS (compared with both the nonmelancholic subset and controls) and returned higher IL-6 levels than controls. Both depressive groups generated higher PCC scores than controls, with no difference between melancholic and nonmelancholic subsets. Conclusion: A sign-based measure to rate melancholia was able to replicate and extend biological findings discriminating melancholic depression. Signs of psychomotor disturbance may be a useful diagnostic measure of melancholia.
机译:背景:本研究的目的是通过一系列生物标记物,将通过可观察到的精神运动障碍的CORE评估与非忧郁和对照受试者的抑郁症患者进行比较。方法:使用CORE度量将抑郁症患者分为忧郁症或非忧郁症患者。比较两组患者以及对照组受试者的一组临床和实验室指标。血清中脑源性神经营养因子,氧化应激的两个标志物(蛋白质羰基含量[PCC]和硫代巴比妥酸反应性物质[TBARS])以及几种免疫标志物(白介素[IL] -2,IL-4,分析了IL-6,IL-10,IL-17,肿瘤坏死因子-α和干扰素-γ。结果:对33例抑郁患者和54例健康对照者进行了研究。抑郁症患者的IL-4,IL-6和PCC值均高于健康对照组。通过CORE措施将13名(39%)抑郁患者定为忧郁症患者。他们产生较低的干扰素-γ(与非忧郁抑郁症患者相比)和TBARS(与非忧郁症亚组和对照组相比),并返回高于对照组的IL-6水平。两组抑郁症患者的PCC得分均高于对照组,而忧郁和非忧郁亚组之间无差异。结论:基于体征的抑郁症评分方法能够复制和扩展区分抑郁症的生物学发现。精神运动障碍的迹象可能是抑郁症的有用诊断手段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号