首页> 外文期刊>NeoBiota >Predators vs. alien: differential biotic resistance to an invasive species by two resident predators
【24h】

Predators vs. alien: differential biotic resistance to an invasive species by two resident predators

机译:捕食者与外来者:两种常驻捕食者对入侵物种的不同生物抗性

获取原文
           

摘要

The success of invading species can be restricted by interspecific interactions such as competition and predation (i.e. biotic resistance) from resident species, which may be natives or previous invaders. Whilst there are myriad examples of resident species preying on invaders, simply showing that such an interaction exists does not demonstrate that predation limits invader establishment, abundance or spread. Support for this conclusion requires evidence of negative associations between invaders and resident predators in the field and, further, that the predator-prey interaction is likely to strongly regulate or potentially de-stabilise the introduced prey population. Moreover, it must be considered that different resident predator species may have different abilities to restrict invaders. In this study, we show from analysis of field data that two European predatory freshwater amphipods, Gammarus pulex and Gammarus duebeni celticus, have strong negative field associations with their prey, the invasive North American amphipod Crangonyx pseudogracilis. This negative field association is significantly stronger with Gammarus pulex, a previous and now resident invader in the study sites, than with the native Gammarus duebeni celticus. These field patterns were consistent with our experimental findings that both resident predators display potentially population de-stabilising Type II functional responses towards the invasive prey, with a significantly greater magnitude of response exhibited by Gammarus pulex than by Gammarus duebeni celticus. Further, these Type II functional responses were consistent across homo- and heterogeneous environments, contrary to the expectation that heterogeneity facilitates more stabilising Type III functional responses through the provision of prey refugia. Our experimental approach confirms correlative field surveys and thus supports the hypothesis that resident predatory invertebrates are differentially limiting the distribution and abundance of an introduced invertebrate. We discuss how the comparative functional response approach not only enhances understanding of the success or failure of invasions in the face of various resident predators, but potentially also allows prediction of population- and community-level outcomes of species introductions.
机译:入侵物种的成功可能受到种间相互作用的限制,例如来自本地物种或本地入侵者的竞争性物种的竞争和掠食(即生物抗性)。尽管有无数种常驻物种入侵捕食者的例子,但简单地表明存在这种相互作用并不能说明捕食限制了入侵者的建立,数量或传播。要支持这一结论,就需要证据表明入侵者与当地捕食者之间存在负相关关系,此外,捕食者与猎物的相互作用很可能会强烈调节或稳定引入的猎物种群。此外,必须考虑到,不同的常驻捕食者物种可能具有不同的限制入侵者的能力。在这项研究中,我们通过对实地数据的分析表明,两种欧洲掠食性淡水两栖动物Gammarus pulex和Gammarus Duebeni celticus与它们的猎物即侵入性北美两栖动物Crangonyx pseudogracilis有很强的负面田间联系。与研究地点的先前和现在的入侵者伽玛鲁斯·普雷克斯相比,这种负场关联要明显强于本地伽玛鲁斯·杜比尼·凯尔蒂库斯。这些田间模式与我们的实验发现相一致,这两个常住的捕食者均显示出潜在的种群对侵袭性猎物的II型功能性不稳定反应,而伽玛鲁斯犬的反应幅度明显大于伽玛鲁斯·赛贝尼凯尔特人。此外,这些II型功能性反应在同质和异质环境中是一致的,这与通过提供猎物避难所促进异质性促进更稳定的III型功能性反应的预期相反。我们的实验方法证实了相关的现场调查,因此支持以下假设:常驻掠食性无脊椎动物有差异地限制了所引入无脊椎动物的分布和丰度。我们讨论了比较功能响应方法如何不仅增强了面对各种驻地捕食者入侵的成功或失败的理解,而且还潜在地允许预测物种引进的种群和社区水平的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号