首页> 外文期刊>Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences >Standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy alone versus in combination with intraoperative anterograde flexible nephroscopy for staghorn stones: A retrospective study
【24h】

Standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy alone versus in combination with intraoperative anterograde flexible nephroscopy for staghorn stones: A retrospective study

机译:单独标准经皮肾镜取石术与术中顺行软性肾镜联合治疗鹿角结石的回顾性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) to PCNL with intraoperative antegrade flexible nephroscopy (IAFN) for treating stones of staghorn nature. We retrospectively analyzed patients treated using PCNL between January 2007 and July 2013. A total of 1250 patients were treated using PCNL, and 166 patients had staghorn stones. All patients had been subjected to a complete blood count, routine biochemical analyses, coagulation tests, a complete urine analysis, and urine cultures. Patients with a positive urine culture had been treated with appropriate antibiotics until the urine culture became negative. After purchasing a flexible renoscope in March 2012, we routinely used this tool to improve the stone-free (SF) rate. The 105 patients who underwent standard PCNL prior to March 2012 were classified as Group 1, and the 61 patients who underwent PCNL?+?IAFN after that date were classified as Group 2. The two groups had similar and homogeneous demographic data. The fluoroscopy and total operative times were significantly higher in Group 2 than in Group 1 ( p ??0.01). Additionally, the hospitalization time ( p ??0.01) and the mean hematocrit decrease ( p ??0.01) were significantly lower in Group 1. In both groups, the SF rates were higher than 85%, similar to those reported in the literature. Although Group 2 had a slightly better SF rates, this difference was not statistically significant. For staghorn calculi, PCNL combined with IAFN yields excellent outcomes. However, similar prospective studies on larger cohorts should be performed to support our findings.
机译:这项研究旨在比较标准的经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)与PCNL与术中顺行软性肾镜(IAFN)治疗鹿角形结石的疗效。我们回顾性分析了2007年1月至2013年7月期间使用PCNL治疗的患者。总共1250例使用PCNL治疗的患者,其中166例有鹿角结石。所有患者均接受了全血细胞计数,常规生化分析,凝血测试,完整尿液分析和尿液培养。尿培养阳性的患者接受了适当的抗生素治疗,直到尿培养阴性。在2012年3月购买了柔性肾镜之后,我们通常会使用此工具来提高无结石(SF)率。在2012年3月之前将105例接受标准PCNL的患者归为第1组,在该日期之后接受PCNL?+?IAFN的61例患者则归为第2组。两组的人口统计学数据相似且均一。第2组的透视和总手术时间明显高于第1组(p <0.01)。此外,第1组的住院时间(p 0.01)和平均血细胞比容下降(p 0.01)显着降低。两组的SF率均高于85%,与报告中的相似。文学。尽管第2组的SF率略高,但这一差异在统计学上并不显着。对于鹿角结石,PCNL与IAFN结合可获得出色的疗效。但是,应该对较大的队列进行类似的前瞻性研究,以支持我们的发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号