首页> 外文期刊>Neurotherapeutics >Clinical and Demographic Profile of Patients Receiving Fingolimod in Clinical Practice in Germany and the Benefit–Risk Profile of Fingolimod After 1 Year of Treatment: Initial Results From the Observational, Noninterventional Study PANGAEA
【24h】

Clinical and Demographic Profile of Patients Receiving Fingolimod in Clinical Practice in Germany and the Benefit–Risk Profile of Fingolimod After 1 Year of Treatment: Initial Results From the Observational, Noninterventional Study PANGAEA

机译:德国临床实践中接受芬戈莫德治疗的患者的临床和人口统计学资料以及治疗1年后芬戈莫德的获益-风险状况:观察性,非干预性研究PANGEA的初步结果

获取原文
           

摘要

The population with multiple sclerosis receiving treatment in clinical practice differs from that in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). An assessment of the real-world benefit–risk profile of therapies is needed. This analysis used data from the large, noninterventional, observational German study Post-Authorization Non-interventional German sAfety study of GilEnyA (PANGAEA) to assess prospectively baseline characteristics and outcomes after 12 months (± 90 days) of fingolimod treatment. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: fingolimod starter [first received fingolimod in PANGAEA ( n = 3315)] and previous study [received fingolimod before enrollment in PANGAEA in RCTs ( n = 875), some of whom also had baseline data at entry into RCTs ( n = 505)]. At PANGAEA baseline, patients in the fingolimod starter versus the previous study cohort had a higher annualized relapse rate [ARR (95% confidence interval): 1.79 (1.75–1.83) vs 1.32 (1.25–1.40)] and Expanded Disability Status Scale score [3.11 (3.04–3.17) vs 2.55 (2.44–2.66)]. A greater proportion in the fingolimod starter versus previous study cohort had diabetes (2.0% vs 0.7%). After 12 months of fingolimod, ARRs were lower than in the 12 months before PANGAEA enrollment in the fingolimod starter [0.386 (0.360–0.414)] and previous study [0.276 (0.238–0.320)] cohorts. Expanded Disability Status Scale scores were stable versus baseline. Adverse events were experienced by similar proportions in both cohorts during fingolimod treatment. Relevant differences exist in disease activity and comorbidities between patients receiving fingolimod in clinical practice versus RCTs. Irrespective of baseline differences indicating a higher proportion at an advanced stage of multiple sclerosis in the real world versus RCTs, fingolimod remains effective, with a manageable safety profile. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s13311-017-0595-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:临床实践中接受治疗的多发性硬化症人群与随机对照试验(RCT)不同。需要评估治疗方法的现实利益-风险特征。该分析使用了来自大型,非干预性观察性德国研究的GilEnyA授权后非干预性德国安全性研究(PANGAEA)中的数据,以评估芬戈莫德治疗12个月(±90天)后的前瞻性基线特征和预后。患者分为两个队列:芬戈莫德初学者[首先在PANGEA中接受芬戈莫德(n = 3315)]和先前的研究[在FCT中加入PANGEA之前接受芬戈莫德(n = 875),其中一些在进入RCT时也具有基线数据。 (n = 505)]。在PANGEA基线,芬戈莫德起搏器组与先前的研究队列相比,患者的年复发率更高[ARR(95%置信区间):1.79(1.75-1.83)vs 1.32(1.25-1.40)]和扩展的残疾状态量表评分[ 3.11(3.04-3.17)vs 2.55(2.44-2.66)]。与先前的研究队列相比,芬戈莫德起始者中糖尿病的比例更高(2.0%比0.7%)。芬戈莫德12个月后,ARR低于芬戈莫德起始者[0.386(0.360–0.414)]和先前研究[0.276(0.238–0.320)]队列中PANGEA入组前的12个月。扩展的残疾状况量表评分相对于基线是稳定的。在芬戈莫德治疗期间,两个队列的不良事件发生率均相似。在临床实践中,接受芬戈莫德治疗的患者与RCT患者在疾病活动和合并症之间存在相关差异。无论基线差异表明在现实世界中多发性硬化症的晚期阶段相对于RCT的比例更高,芬戈莫德仍然有效,安全性可控。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(10.1007 / s13311-017-0595-y)包含补充材料,授权用户可以使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号