...
首页> 外文期刊>Nepal Journal of Medical Sciences >Patterns of infective sero positivity among blood donors in a rural Medical College Regional Blood Transfusion centre: A retrospective study
【24h】

Patterns of infective sero positivity among blood donors in a rural Medical College Regional Blood Transfusion centre: A retrospective study

机译:乡村医学院区域输血中心献血者中感染性血清阳性的模式:一项回顾性研究

获取原文

摘要

Background: Transfusion-transmitted infections (TTI) is still burden that continue to be a threat to safe transfusion practices of blood & components and one of the major problem in delayed transfusion hazards. In the present study prevalence and patterns of co-infections among voluntary and replacement donors were analyzed. Methods: This is descriptive study. Blood collected over a 6-year period were studied for the type of donation (voluntary or replacement), number of seroreactive cases and the number, type and distribution of co-infections among different type of donors. Results: Out of 127995 units of collected blood, 106755 (83.40%) were voluntary and 21240(16.60%) replacement donors of them 1463 were seroreactive. Out of 1463 seroreactive cases (1.14%) 128(0.10%), 137(0.11%),1025(0.8%) & 173(0.13%) were HIV, HCV, HBsAg (Hepatitis B surface antigen) & VDRL (Venereal Diseases Research Laboratory) respectively. 30 (0.02%) cases of seropositive samples showed more than one seroreactive reactions which were collected 14(0.06%) from replacement donors and 16(0.01%) samples from voluntary donors. Only 2 samples (0.001 %) of repeat donors show seropositivity. Conclusion: Possibilities of transfusion transmitted infections were more with replacement blood donors in comparison to voluntary blood donors. Repeat donors were safer than first time donors. Though the incidence was less, chances of multiple infections were still problems to the recipients. Proper history taking, screening and encouragement of blood donation would definitely reduce the chances of transfusion transmitted infection. Nepal Journal of Medical Sciences | Volume 02 | Number 01 | Jan-Jun 2013 | Page 3-8 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126jms.v2i1.7643
机译:背景:输血传播感染(TTI)仍然是负担,继续威胁到血液和成分的安全输血操作,也是延迟输血危害的主要问题之一。在本研究中,分析了自愿和替代供体之间共感染的患病率和模式。方法:这是描述性研究。研究了在6年期间收集的血液的捐赠类型(自愿或替代),血清反应性病例数以及不同类型供体之间共感染的数目,类型和分布。结果:在127995个单位的采血中,有106755个(83.40%)是自愿的,有21240个(16.60%)的替代供血者是血清反应性的。在1463例血清反应性病例中(1.14%)128(0.10%),137(0.11%),1025(0.8%)和173(0.13%)是HIV,HCV,HBsAg(乙型肝炎表面抗原)和VDRL(性病研究)实验室)。 30例(0.02%)血清反应阳性样本显示多于一种血清反应反应,这些反应是从替代供体中收集到的(14%)(0.06%),从自愿性供体中收集到的样本为16(0.01%)。仅2个样本(0.001%)的重复供体显示出血清阳性。结论:与自愿献血者相比,替代献血者输血传播感染的可能性更高。重复捐献者比第一次捐献者更安全。尽管发病率较低,但多重感染的机会仍然是接受者面临的问题。正确地进行历史记录,筛查和鼓励献血肯定会减少输血传播感染的机会。尼泊尔医学杂志|第02卷|编号01 | 2013年1月至6月|第3-8页DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.3126jms.v2i1.7643

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号