首页> 外文期刊>Nature environment and pollution technology >Games Strategy Study of Power Generation and Carbon Emission Rights Trading
【24h】

Games Strategy Study of Power Generation and Carbon Emission Rights Trading

机译:发电与碳排放权交易的博弈策略研究

获取原文
           

摘要

It is of great significance to reduce carbon emissions from electric power generation for green development. In addition to technical measures, two trading mechanisms are built to optimize China’s electric power generation: generation rights trading, and carbon emission rights trading. However, as the carbon emission rights trading are initiated, the issues of how to choose the right trading mechanism, and determining the appropriate strategy under the corresponding trading mechanism continue to confuse generation enterprises. In order to clarify these issues, the game theory was used to identify the proper trading strategies for generation enterprises under the two highly similar trade mechanisms. Results show that the two trading mechanisms are complementary to each other to some extent, and the generation enterprises should choose a proper trade strategy according to the endowment of generation prices, the technical abilities, the grid-loss price and the ratio of carbon-electricity conversion. The equilibrium solutions of trading scales and prices for the two trading mechanisms are mostly related to the endowments of generation prices. Generally, the buyers with higher endowments of generation prices should choose the carbon emission rights trading, and the buyers with lower endowments of generation prices can only benefit in generation rights trading. The bigger gaps between the endowments of generation prices of buyers and sellers are, the more likely the trade can be made and further result in a better environmental consequence. The conclusions provide suggestions to the government that, the grid-loss pricing and the ratio of carbon-electricity conversion could be used as key tools to regulate the market for both of the trade mechanisms.
机译:减少发电的碳排放对于绿色发展具有重要意义。除了技术措施外,还建立了两种交易机制来优化中国的发电:发电权交易和碳排放权交易。然而,随着碳排放权交易的开始,如何选择正确的交易机制以及在相应的交易机制下确定适当策略的问题继续困扰发电企业。为了弄清这些问题,使用博弈论为两种高度相似的贸易机制下的发电企业确定合适的贸易策略。结果表明,两种贸易机制在一定程度上是互补的,发电企业应根据发电价格的the赋,技术能力,电网亏损价格和碳电比来选择合适的贸易策略。转换。两种贸易机制的交易规模和价格的均衡解主要与发电价格的related赋有关。一般而言,发电价格end赋较高的购买者应选择碳排放权交易,发电价格end赋较低的购买者只能在发电权交易中受益。买卖双方的发电价格the赋之间的差距越大,进行交易的可能性就越大,并进一步导致更好的环境后果。结论为政府提供了建议,电网损失定价和碳电转换比例可以用作调节这两种贸易机制市场的关键工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号