...
首页> 外文期刊>Nature Conservation >Roads may act as barriers to flying insects: species composition of bees and wasps differs on two sides of a large highway
【24h】

Roads may act as barriers to flying insects: species composition of bees and wasps differs on two sides of a large highway

机译:道路可能成为飞行昆虫的屏障:蜜蜂和黄蜂的种类组成在大型公路的两侧有所不同

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Roads may act as barriers to animal movements, but direct barrier effects on insects have rarely been studied. In this study we collected data on bees and wasps along two sides of a large road in Sweden using yellow pan traps. We then analyzed if the species composition differed between the two sides of the road; first for the whole community, and then only for the smallest species (which typically are poorer dispersers). As a complement, we analyzed if different vegetation variables differed between the two sides of the road, as this may also affect differences in species composition. Finally, we analyzed if species richness and abundance in general differed between the two sides and how these two response variables were explained by the vegetation variables. There was a significant difference in species composition between the eastern and the western side of the road when analyzing the whole community, and this relationship became even stronger when the largest species were excluded. The vegetation variables did not strongly differ between the two sides, and there was no difference in species richness and abundance of bees and wasps either. Abundance was, however, explained by the number of flowering plants in the surroundings of the trap. Even though using a rather limited data set, our results indicate that large roads may act as barriers on the movement of bees and wasps, especially for small species with poor dispersal ability. On the other hand, road verges may be important habitat for many species, which leads to a potential conflict that is important to consider in the planning of green infrastructure.
机译:道路可能是阻碍动物活动的屏障,但很少研究对昆虫的直接屏障作用。在这项研究中,我们使用黄盘陷阱收集了瑞典一条大路两侧的蜜蜂和黄蜂的数据。然后,我们分析了道路两侧之间的物种组成是否不同;首先是整个社区,然后是最小的物种(通常是较差的分散者)。作为补充,我们分析了道路两侧之间不同的植被变量是否不同,因为这也可能影响物种组成的差异。最后,我们分析了物种的丰富度和丰度总体上在这两个方面是否存在差异,以及这两个反应变量是如何由植被变量解释的。在分析整个社区时,道路的东侧和西侧之间的物种组成存在显着差异,而当排除最大物种时,这种关系甚至更加紧密。两侧的植被变量没有很大的差异,蜜蜂和黄蜂的物种丰富度和丰富度也没有差异。但是,陷阱周围的开花植物数量可以解释其丰度。即使使用相当有限的数据集,我们的结果也表明,大路可能成为蜜蜂和黄蜂运动的障碍,特别是对于散布能力差的小物种而言。另一方面,道路绿化对许多物种而言可能是重要的栖息地,这导致潜在的冲突,在绿色基础设施的规划中必须考虑这一潜在冲突。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号