首页> 外文期刊>National Journal of Medical Research >A Comparative Study of Circumcision and Preputioplasty in Pediatric Cases of Phimosis: A Prospective Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital, Bhavnagar, Gujarat
【24h】

A Comparative Study of Circumcision and Preputioplasty in Pediatric Cases of Phimosis: A Prospective Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital, Bhavnagar, Gujarat

机译:小儿包茎包皮环切术和包皮成形术的比较研究:在古吉拉特邦巴夫那加尔三级医院的前瞻性研究

获取原文
       

摘要

"Introduction: Preputioplasty have gained a new interest now days because the retained preputial skin with mucosa after preputioplasty gives good cosmetic appearance and it can be utilized in future for urethral stricture surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the post-operative complications and post-operative hospital stay in patients operated by circumcision and preputioplasty. Methodology: This prospective study included 50 patients (age less than 4 years) having phimosis, treated during July 2010 to July 2012. These patients were treated by two methods viz. circumcision and preputioplasty (25 cases by each method).The patients were assessed post-operatively at day 1, day 15, at 2 months and at 3 months. Results: The study revealed that the immediate post-operative complications like pain, bleeding, oedema, difficulty in micturition and fever were present after both the procedures. But post-operative pain (84%), bleeding (24%) and difficulty in micturition (16%) were higher after circumcision than after preputioplasty (40%, 4% and 4% cases respectively). Post-operative oedema was more prominent in preputioplasty-operated patients (84%). Post-operative hospital stay was longer in cases treated with circumcision. After three months, recurrent adhesions were more common after preputioplasty (32%). Cosmetic appearance was acceptable in patients operated with both the procedures. Conclusion: Preputioplastyis a faster, easier, relatively painless technique with excellent cosmetic results and lesser complications than circumcision, except post-operative edema and adhesions. "
机译:“简介:术前修补术已经引起了新的兴趣,因为术前保留的术前粘膜保留的术前皮肤具有良好的外观,并且可以在将来用于尿道狭窄手术。该研究的目的是比较术后并发症和方法:这项前瞻性研究包括2010年7月至2012年7月接受治疗的50例包茎包茎患者(年龄小于4岁),分别接受包皮环切术和包皮环切术两种方法治疗。术前术(每种方法25例)。在术后第1天,第15天,第2个月和第3个月对患者进行评估。结果:研究表明,术后立即出现并发症,例如疼痛,出血,水肿,两种方法均存在排尿困难和发烧困难,但术后疼痛(84%),出血(24%)和排尿困难(16%)更高包皮环切术后比包皮成形术后(分别为40%,4%和4%)。术前术前患者的术后水肿更为突出(84%)。包皮环切术治疗的病人术后住院时间更长。三个月后,前粘膜成形术后复发性粘连更为常见(32%)。使用这两种方法进行手术的患者的外观都是可以接受的。结论:与包皮环切术相比,除手术后水肿和粘连外,包膜成形术是一种更快,更容易,相对无痛的技术,具有优异的美容效果,并发症少。 ”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号