首页> 外文期刊>Nagoya journal of medical science >An overview of ethical review committees in Japan: examining the certification applications of ethical review committees
【24h】

An overview of ethical review committees in Japan: examining the certification applications of ethical review committees

机译:日本道德审查委员会概述:审查道德审查委员会的认证申请

获取原文
       

摘要

The survey involves examining the applications from 142 institutions that have consented to make available all certification applications from 2015 and 2016 to a research project for building a certification system for an ethics committee run by the Agency for Medical Research and Development. The number of certified institutions is 20 (14.1%). In the applications from uncertified institutions, there are cases in which requirements of ethics guidelines are unmet, and there is insufficient information provided on regulation and procedure. An analysis of the committee members who can contribute as members of the general public (general public committee members) has indicated that the number of committee members who do not belong to an institution in which an ethics committee is instituted (external committee members) is 41 (95.7%) among the certified institutions and 224 (84.5%) among the uncertified institutions. The proportion of general public committee members drawn internally from institutions tends to be higher among uncertified institutions. While a separate committee examined conflicts of interest in research in 19 certified institutions (95.0%), such conflicts were found in 41 uncertified institutions (33.9%) by the ethics committee. The survey confirms that the challenge lies in increasing the number of external committee members and in further improving the system to manage conflicts of interest, and the education and training regime.
机译:该调查涉及审查142家同意向2015年和2016年提供所有认证申请的机构的申请,该研究项目旨在为医学研究与发展局(EPA)经营的伦理委员会建立认证体系。认证机构的数量为20(14.1%)。在未经认证的机构提出的申请中,有时会违反道德准则的要求,并且没有提供足够的有关法规和程序的信息。对可以作为普通公众做出贡献的委员会成员(一般公共委员会成员)的分析表明,不属于设立道德委员会的机构的委员会成员(外部委员会成员)的数量为41 (95.7%)个在认证机构中,224个(84.5%)在非认证机构中。在未经认证的机构中,内部从机构中抽出的一般公共委员会成员的比例往往较高。道德委员会在一个独立的委员会研究了19个认证机构(95.0%)的研究中的利益冲突时,发现了41个未经认证的机构(33.9%)的此类利益冲突。调查证实,挑战在于增加外部委员会成员的人数,进一步改善管理利益冲突的制度以及教育和培训制度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号