...
首页> 外文期刊>Kosuyolu Kalp Dergisi >Transradial Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention is Associated with Low Rates of Clinical and Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
【24h】

Transradial Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention is Associated with Low Rates of Clinical and Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

机译:经radi动脉原位经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的临床和心血管事件发生率低相关

获取原文
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The transradial (TR) approach has been increasingly employed as an alternative approach to the transfemoral (TF) approach in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to investigate the impact of TR approach on clinical outcomes in 1st and 6th months compared with a TF approach in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary PCI.METHODS: Three hundred fifteen patients who underwent primary PCI for STEMI were evaluated retrospectively. TR approach group consisted of 55 patients (19 females, mean age: 55±10 years), and TF approach group consisted of 74 patients (21 females, mean-age 53±9 years). Endpoints included the rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: death, recurrent MI, target lesion revascularization and stroke) and net adverse clinical events (NACE: MACE and bleeding) at the first and six-months.RESULTS: The two groups were similar in terms of baseline clinical characteristics. Arterial cannulation, door-to-balloon and total-procedure times, and access-site crossover rates were not significantly different between TR approach and TF approach groups (p=0.966, p=0.139, p=0.393, and p=0.197; respectively). While infarction localizations and the numbers of treated vessel were similar in both groups, the use of tirofiban was higher (p=0.025) and hospital stay was lower (p=0.017) in TR approach. The 30-day rate of MACE was lower in TR approach than that in TF approach, but not statistically significant (p=0.119). The 30-day rate of NACE was significantly lower in TF approach (p=0.006). At the 6th month, the TR approach had significantly lower rates of MACE (p=0.039) and NACE (p=0.002) as compared to TF approach. CONCLUSION: TR approach had similar procedural times and was associated with lower clinical and cardiovascular events in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI as compared to those of TF approach.
机译:目的:在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中,经radi动脉(TR)方法已成为经股动脉(TF)方法的替代方法。我们旨在调查在进行原发性PCI的ST抬高型心肌梗塞(STEMI)患者中,TR方法与TF方法相比,在第1和第6个月的临床结果中的影响。方法:评估了115例接受原发性PCI的STEMI的患者追溯地。 TR方法组包括55例患者(19例女性,平均年龄:55±10岁),而TF方法组包括74例患者(21例女性,平均年龄53±9岁)。终点包括头和六个月的主要不良心血管事件发生率(MACE:死亡,复发性MI,靶病变血运重建和中风)和净不良临床事件发生率(NACE:MACE和出血)。结果:两组相似就基线临床特征而言。 TR进路和TF进路组之间的动脉插管,门到气囊和总手术时间以及进入部位交叉率没有显着差异(分别为p = 0.966,p = 0.139,p = 0.393和p = 0.197; )。尽管两组的梗死部位和治疗血管数相似,但在TR方法中,替罗非班的使用率较高(p = 0.025),住院时间较低(p = 0.017)。 TR方法的MACE 30天发生率低于TF方法,但无统计学意义(p = 0.119)。在TF法中,NACE的30天发生率显着降低(p = 0.006)。与TF方法相比,在第6个月,TR方法的MACE(p = 0.039)和NACE(p = 0.002)的发生率显着降低。结论:与TF方法相比,接受原发PCI的STEMI患者的TR方法具有相似的手术时间,并且与较低的临床和心血管事件相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号