...
首页> 外文期刊>Korean journal of radiology : >Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficients of the Brain in Healthy Controls: A Comparison Study between Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging and Read-out-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging
【24h】

Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficients of the Brain in Healthy Controls: A Comparison Study between Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging and Read-out-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging

机译:健康对照者的大脑表观扩散系数分析:单发回波平面成像与读出分段回波平面成像之间的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective To compare apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of brain segments by using two diffusion-weighted imaging acquisition modes, single-shot echo-planar imaging (ss-EPI) and read-out-segmented echo-planar imaging (rs-EPI), and to assess their correlation and agreement in healthy controls. Materials and Methods T2-weighted (T2W) images, rs-EPI, and ss-EPI of 30 healthy subjects were acquired using a 3T magnetic resonance scanner. The T2W images were co-registered to the rs-EPI and ss-EPI, which were then segmented into the gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to generate masking templates. ADC maps of rs-EPI and ss-EPI were also segmented into the GM, WM, and CSF by using the generated templates. ADCs of rs-EPI and ss-EPI were compared using Student's t tests and correlated using Pearson's correlation coefficients. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the agreement between acquisitions. Results ADCs of rs-EPI and ss-EPI were significantly different in the GM ( p 0.988; p 0.001). ADC of the WM showed the least correlation ( r = 0.894; p 0.001), and ADCs of the WM and GM showed poor agreement. Pearson's correlation equations for each brain segment were y = 1.1x - 59.4 (GM), y = 1.45x - 255 (WM), and y = 0.98x - 63.5 (CSF), where x and y indicated ADCs of rs-EPI and ss-EPI, respectively. Conclusion While ADCs of rs-EPI and ss-EPI showed high correlation and agreement in the whole brain and CSF, ADCs of the WM and GM showed significant differences and large variability, reflecting brain parenchymal inhomogeneity due to different regional microenvironments. ADCs of different acquisition methods should be interpreted carefully, especially in intra-individual comparisons.
机译:目的使用两种扩散加权成像采集模式(单次回波平面成像(ss-EPI)和读出分段式回波平面成像(rs-EPI))比较脑段的表观扩散系数(ADC),并评估他们在健康对照中的相关性和一致性。材料和方法使用3T磁共振扫描仪获取30例健康受试者的T2加权(T2W)图像,rs-EPI和ss-EPI。将T2W图像共同注册到rs-EPI和ss-EPI,然后将其分割为灰质(GM),白质(WM)和脑脊液(CSF)以生成掩蔽模板。还使用生成的模板将rs-EPI和ss-EPI的ADC映射图分割为GM,WM和CSF。使用学生t检验比较rs-EPI和ss-EPI的ADC,并使用Pearson相关系数进行相关。使用Bland-Altman地块评估收购之间的协议。结果rs-EPI和ss-EPI的ADC在GM中有显着差异(p 0.988; p <0.001)。 WM的ADC的相关性最低(r = 0.894; p <0.001),WM和GM的ADC的一致性较差。每个脑段的皮尔逊相关方程为y = 1.1x-59.4(GM),y = 1.45x-255(WM)和y = 0.98x-63.5(CSF),其中x和y表示rs-EPI和ADC ss-EPI。结论rs-EPI和ss-EPI的ADC在全脑和CSF中显示出高度的相关性和一致性,而WM和GM的ADC显示出显着的差异和较大的变异性,反映出由于不同的区域微环境而导致的脑实质不均匀。应仔细解释不同采集方法的ADC,尤其是在内部比较中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号