首页> 外文期刊>Korean journal of radiology : >Prospectively Electrocardiogram-Gated High-Pitch Spiral Acquisition Mode Dual-Source CT Coronary Angiography in Patients with High Heart Rates: Comparison with Retrospective Electrocardiogram-Gated Spiral Acquisition Mode
【24h】

Prospectively Electrocardiogram-Gated High-Pitch Spiral Acquisition Mode Dual-Source CT Coronary Angiography in Patients with High Heart Rates: Comparison with Retrospective Electrocardiogram-Gated Spiral Acquisition Mode

机译:高心率患者的前瞻性心电门控高螺距螺旋采集模式双源CT冠状动脉造影:与回顾性心电图门控螺旋采集模式的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective To assess the image quality and effective radiation dose of prospectively electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated high-pitch spiral acquisition mode (flash mode) of dual-source CT (DSCT) coronary angiography (CTCA) in patients with high heart rates (HRs) as compared with retrospectively ECG-gated spiral acquisition mode. Materials and Methods Two hundred and sixty-eight consecutive patients (132 female, mean age: 55 ± 11 years) with mean HR > 65 beats per minute (bpm) were prospectively included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups. Collection was performed in group A CTCA using flash mode setting at 20-30% of the R-R interval, and retrospectively ECG-gated spiral acquisition mode in group B. The image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), image quality scores, effective radiation dose and influencing factors on image quality between the two groups were assessed. Results There were no significant differences in image quality scores and proportions of non-diagnostic coronary artery segments between two groups (image quality scores: 1.064 ± 0.306 [group A] vs. 1.084 ± 0.327 [group B], p = 0.063; proportion of non-diagnostic coronary artery segments: segment-based analysis 1.52% (group A) vs. 1.74% (group B), p = 0.345; patient-based analysis 7.5% (group A) vs. 6.7% (group B), p = 0.812). The estimated radiation dose was 1.0 ± 0.16 mSv in group A and 7.1 ± 1.05 mSv in group B ( p = 0.001). Conclusion In conclusion, in patients with HRs > 65 bpm without cardiac arrhythmia, the prospectively high-pitch spiral-acquisition mode with image-acquired timing set at 20-30% of the R-R interval provides a similar image quality and low rate of non-diagnostic coronary segments to the retrospectively ECG-gated low-pitch spiral acquisition mode, with significant reduction of radiation exposure.
机译:目的评估高心率(HRs)双源CT(DSCT)冠状动脉造影(CTCA)的前瞻性心电图(ECG)门控高螺距螺旋采集模式(闪光模式)的图像质量和有效辐射剂量与回顾性心电门控螺旋采集模式相比。资料与方法前瞻性纳入了684名连续患者(132名女性,平均年龄:55±11岁),平均HR> 65次/分(bpm)。将患者分为两组。在A组CTCA中进行采集,使用的闪光模式设置为RR间隔的20%至30%,然后在B组中采用心电门控螺旋采集模式。评估了两组之间的有效辐射剂量和影响图像质量的因素。结果两组之间的图像质量得分和非诊断性冠状动脉节段的比例没有显着差异(图像质量得分:1.064±0.306 [A组]与1.084±0.327 [B组],p = 0.063;非诊断性冠状动脉节段:基于节段的分析1.52%(A组)对比1.74%(B组),p = 0.345;基于患者的分析7.5%(A组)对比6.7%(B组),p = 0.812)。 A组的估计辐射剂量为1.0±0.16 mSv,B组的估计辐射剂量为7.1±1.05 mSv(p = 0.001)。结论总之,对于心律不齐的HRs> 65 bpm的患者,预期的高音阶螺旋获取模式(图像获取定时设置为RR间隔的20%至30%)可提供类似的图像质量,且非心律不全的发生率较低。诊断性冠状动脉节段采用回顾性心电门控低螺距螺旋采集模式,可显着减少放射线照射。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号