首页> 外文期刊>Mountain Research & Development >Collaborative Community-based Governance in a Transboundary Wetland System in the Ecuadorian Andes
【24h】

Collaborative Community-based Governance in a Transboundary Wetland System in the Ecuadorian Andes

机译:厄瓜多尔安第斯山脉跨界湿地系统中基于社区的协作式治理

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract International mountain conservation paradigms have shifted in the past 30?years from establishment of centrally governed protected areas that exclude communities, to collaborative and community-based conservation stewardship with communities that depend on resources for their livelihoods. The Convention on Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Convention) embodies this collaborative paradigm by suggesting that people and local governments can be collective stewards for the “wise use” of wetlands on which they depend for water resources and livelihoods. Although collaborative approaches are increasingly recommended to govern large and complex mountain waterscapes across multiple jurisdictions, recent international case study comparisons highlight the site-specific nature of institutional design and the effect that changing social relations and overlapping or conflicting rights and boundaries have on promised collaborative outcomes. This article illustrates the usefulness of a recently developed community-based natural resource management comparative framework for assessing the feasibility of collaboratively governing a proposed Ramsar wetland in the Southern Andes of Ecuador across multiple communities and jurisdictional boundaries. By using data from a rapid ethnographic assessment, US and Ecuadorian students and faculty found local and institutional support for wetland protection. The framework's preconditions were useful in identifying conflicts among and within communities, and among agency rules and resources; these conflicts could limit the feasibility of community-based and collaborative management unless coordination authority is clarified, especially at the proposed transboundary scale. This study showed that increasing attention to land tenure conflicts and institutional frameworks is needed for any collaborative governance design to be sustainable, which confirms political ecology findings.
机译:摘要在过去的30年中,国际山区保护范式已经从建立不包括社区的中央管理保护区转变为与依靠资源谋生的社区进行合作和基于社区的保护管理。 《国际重要湿地公约》(《拉姆萨尔公约》)体现了这种合作范式,建议人民和地方政府可以成为“明智地使用”他们赖以生存的水资源和生计的湿地的集体管理者。尽管越来越多地建议采用协作方式来管理多个辖区的大型和复杂山区水景,但最近的国际案例研究比较突显了机构设计的特定地点性质,以​​及不断变化的社会关系以及重叠或冲突的权利和边界对承诺的协作成果的影响。本文说明了最近开发的基于社区的自然资源管理比较框架的有用性,该框架用于评估在多个社区和管辖范围内共同管理厄瓜多尔南部安第斯山脉拟议的拉姆萨尔湿地的可行性。通过使用快速的人种志评估数据,美国和厄瓜多尔的学生和教师发现了当地和机构对湿地保护的支持。该框架的先决条件对于查明社区之间和内部以及机构规则和资源之间的冲突很有用;这些冲突可能会限制以社区为基础的协作管理的可行性,除非明确协调权限,尤其是在拟议的跨界规模上。这项研究表明,要使任何协作式治理设计具有可持续性,就必须越来越重视土地所有制冲突和体制框架,这证实了政治生态学的发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号