...
首页> 外文期刊>Korean journal of radiology : >Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules via Ultrasonography: Initial Clinical Experience
【24h】

Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules via Ultrasonography: Initial Clinical Experience

机译:通过超声计算机辅助诊断甲状腺结节:初步临床经验

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) for detection of thyroid cancers via ultrasonography (US). Materials and Methods This study included 50 consecutive patients with 117 thyroid nodules on US during the period between June 2016 and July 2016. A radiologist performed US examinations using real-time CAD integrated into a US scanner. We compared the diagnostic performance of radiologist, the CAD system, and the CAD-assisted radiologist for the detection of thyroid cancers. Results The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of the CAD system were 80.0, 88.1, 83.3, 85.5, and 84.6%, respectively, and were not significantly different from those of the radiologist ( p > 0.05). The CAD-assisted radiologist showed improved diagnostic sensitivity compared with the radiologist alone (92.0% vs. 84.0%, p = 0.037), while the specificity and PPV were reduced (85.1% vs. 95.5%, p = 0.005 and 82.1% vs. 93.3%, p = 0.008). The radiologist assisted by the CAD system exhibited better diagnostic sensitivity and NPV than the CAD system alone (92.0% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.009 and 93.4% vs. 88.9%, p = 0.013), while the specificities and PPVs were not significantly different (88.1% vs. 85.1%, p = 0.151 and 83.3% vs. 82.1%, p = 0.613, respectively). Conclusion The CAD system may be an adjunct to radiological intervention in the diagnosis of thyroid cancer.
机译:目的前瞻性评估计算机辅助诊断(CAD)通过超声(US)检测甲状腺癌的诊断性能。材料和方法该研究纳入2016年6月至2016年7月期间连续50例在美国的117个甲状腺结节患者。放射科医生使用集成在美国扫描仪中的实时CAD进行了美国检查。我们比较了放射科医生,CAD系统和CAD辅助放射科医生对甲状腺癌的诊断性能。结果CAD系统的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值(PPV),阴性预测值(NPV)和准确度分别为80.0、88.1、83.3、85.5和84.6%,与对照组相比无显着差异。放射科医生(p> 0.05)。与单独的放射线医师相比,CAD辅助放射线医师显示出更高的诊断敏感性(92.0%比84.0%,p = 0.037),而特异性和PPV降低了(85.1%比95.5%,p = 0.005和82.1%vs。 93.3%,p = 0.008)。与单独的CAD系统相比,由CAD系统辅助的放射科医生表现出更好的诊断敏感性和NPV(92.0%vs. 80.0%,p = 0.009,93.4%vs. 88.9%,p = 0.013),而特异性和PPV均不显着不同(分别为88.1%和85.1%,p = 0.151和83.3%vs. 82.1%,p = 0.613)。结论CAD系统可作为放射诊断甲状腺癌的辅助手段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号