首页> 外文期刊>Korean journal of radiology : >MRI Inter-Reader and Intra-Reader Reliabilities for Assessing Injury Morphology and Posterior Ligamentous Complex Integrity of the Spine According to the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System and Severity Score
【24h】

MRI Inter-Reader and Intra-Reader Reliabilities for Assessing Injury Morphology and Posterior Ligamentous Complex Integrity of the Spine According to the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System and Severity Score

机译:根据胸腰椎损伤分类系统和严重性评分评估脊柱损伤形态和后韧带完整性的MRI读写器和读写器可靠性

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective To evaluate spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) inter-reader and intra-reader reliabilities using the thoracolumbar injury classification system and severity score (TLICS) and to analyze the effects of reader experience on reliability and the possible reasons for discordant interpretations. Materials and Methods Six radiologists (two senior, two junior radiologists, and two residents) independently scored 100 MRI examinations of thoracolumbar spine injuries to assess injury morphology and posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) integrity according to the TLICS. Inter-reader and intra-reader agreements were determined and analyzed according to the number of years of radiologist experience. Results Inter-reader agreement between the six readers was moderate (k = 0.538 for the first and 0.537 for the second review) for injury morphology and fair to moderate (k = 0.440 for the first and 0.389 for the second review) for PLC integrity. No significant difference in inter-reader agreement was observed according to the number of years of radiologist experience. Intra-reader agreements showed a wide range (k = 0.538-0.822 for injury morphology and 0.423-0.616 for PLC integrity). Agreement was achieved in 44 for the first and 45 for the second review about injury morphology, as well as in 41 for the first and 38 for the second review of PLC integrity. A positive correlation was detected between injury morphology score and PLC integrity. Conclusion The reliability of MRI for assessing thoracolumbar spinal injuries according to the TLICS was moderate for injury morphology and fair to moderate for PLC integrity, which may not be influenced by radiologist' experience.
机译:目的使用胸腰椎损伤分类系统和严重度评分(TLICS)评估脊柱磁共振成像(MRI)的阅读器内部和阅读器内部可靠性,并分析阅读器体验对可靠性的影响以及出现不一致解释的可能原因。材料和方法六位放射科医生(两名高级放射科医生,两名初级放射放射科医生和两名住院医师)独立地对胸腰段脊柱损伤进行了MRI检查100次,以根据TLICS评估损伤形态和后韧带复合体(PLC)的完整性。阅读者之间和阅读者内部协议是根据放射线医生多年的经验确定和分析的。结果六名读者之间的读者间一致性对于损伤形态而言是中等的(第一次审查为k = 0.538,第二次审查为0.537),对于PLC完整性,中等至中等程度(第一次审查k = 0.440,第二次审查0.389)。根据放射医师经验的年限,阅读者之间的协议没有显着差异。阅读器内协议显示范围很广(对于伤害形态,k = 0.538-0.822,对于PLC完整性,k = 0.423-0.616)。第一次就损伤形态在44篇,第二篇对45篇有关PLC完整性的评论中达成了一致。损伤形态评分与PLC完整性之间呈正相关。结论MRI根据TLICS评估胸腰椎脊柱损伤的可靠性中等,对于损伤形态学而言,对PLC完整性而言,中等至中等,这可能不受放射线医师经验的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号