首页> 外文期刊>Molecular Psychiatry >Gene-wide analyses of genome-wide association data sets: evidence for multiple common risk alleles for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder and for overlap in genetic risk
【24h】

Gene-wide analyses of genome-wide association data sets: evidence for multiple common risk alleles for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder and for overlap in genetic risk

机译:全基因组关联数据集的全基因分析:精神分裂症和双相情感障碍的多个常见风险等位基因的证据以及遗传风险的重叠

获取原文
           

摘要

Genome-wide association (GWAS) analyses have identified susceptibility loci for many diseases, but most risk for any complex disorder remains unattributed. There is therefore scope for complementary approaches to these data sets. Gene-wide approaches potentially offer additional insights. They might identify association to genes through multiple signals. Also, by providing support for genes rather than single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), they offer an additional opportunity to compare the results across data sets. We have undertaken gene-wide analysis of two GWAS data sets: schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. We performed two forms of analysis, one based on the smallest P-value per gene, the other on a truncated product of P method. For each data set and at a range of statistical thresholds, we observed significantly more SNPs within genes (Pmin for excessPmin for excess>0.1). At a range of thresholds of significance, we also observed substantially more associated genes than expected (Pmin for excess in schizophrenia=1.8 × 10?8, in bipolar=2.4 × 10?6). Moreover, an excess of genes showed evidence for association across disorders. Among those genes surpassing thresholds highly enriched for true association, we observed evidence for association to genes reported in other GWAS data sets (CACNA1C) or to closely related family members of those genes including CSF2RB, CACNA1B and DGKI. Our analyses show that association signals are enriched in and around genes, large numbers of genes contribute to both disorders and gene-wide analyses offer useful complementary approaches to more standard methods.
机译:全基因组关联(GWAS)分析已经确定了许多疾病的易感基因座,但是任何复杂疾病的大多数风险仍未归因。因此,存在针对这些数据集的补充方法的范围。全基因范围的方法可能会提供其他见解。他们可能会通过多种信号识别与基因的关联。而且,通过提供对基因的支持,而不是单核苷酸多态性(SNP),它们为在数据集之间比较结果提供了额外的机会。我们对两个GWAS数据集进行了全基因分析:精神分裂症和双相情感障碍。我们执行了两种形式的分析,一种基于每个基因的最小P值,另一种基于P方法的截短乘积。对于每个数据集,并在一定的统计阈值范围内,我们观察到了基因内明显更多的SNP(过量的Pmin,过量的> 0.1的Pmin)。在重要的阈值范围内,我们还观察到了比预期多得多的相关基因(精神分裂症过量的Pmin = 1.8×10-8,双极性的Pmin = 2.4×10-6)。此外,过量的基因显示出跨疾病关联的证据。在那些超过为真正的关联而高度丰富的阈值的基因中,我们观察到了与其他GWAS数据集(CACNA1C)中报道的基因或与那些基因的紧密相关家族成员(包括CSF2RB,CACNA1B和DGKI)关联的证据。我们的分析表明,关联信号在基因内部和周围都富集,大量基因对两种疾病都有影响,全基因范围的分析为更标准的方法提供了有用的补充方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号