...
首页> 外文期刊>Korean Circulation Journal >Assessment of the Accuracy of Digitally Recorded Velocity Information of Color Doppler Flow Mapping:in vitro Validation Using a Flow Phantom
【24h】

Assessment of the Accuracy of Digitally Recorded Velocity Information of Color Doppler Flow Mapping:in vitro Validation Using a Flow Phantom

机译:彩色多普勒血流图数字记录的速度信息的准确性评估:使用流幻影的体外验证

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Qunatitation of blood flow within the cardiac chambers has been tried using digitally recorded velocity information of color Doppler flow mapping (CDFM). However, the accuracy of CDFM has not been systematically assessed. The purpose of the study was to test the accuracy of digitally recorded velocity information obtained through CDFM. Method Using the American Society of Echocardiography flow phantom, an in vitro steady flow experiment was performed. Eight different flow fields through the phantom (84, 139, 172, 192, 232, 237, 244, 436 mL/sec) were imaged by CDFM using Hewlett Packard Sonos 2500 and all data were stored in the magneto-optical disc. Multiple aliases were visible and 7 different Nyquist limits (17, 23, 27, 37, 42, 53, 58 cm/sec) were used for recording. A fully automatic computer algorithm was used to unwrap the aliases and to convert the CDFM to digital velocity. Among 9 consecutive values at each pixel along the centerline of the phantom, median value was chosen as a representative value, which was compared to the actual value. Results In the slow velocity region, CDFM tends to overestimate the true velocity, whereas in the fast velocity region, it underestimates. At the aliasing point of 2 times Nyquist limit, there is a marked turbulence and estimation of velocity is impossible;fter aliasing, velocity information of CDFM is totally unreliable. Velocity estimation of CDFM is the most accurate at the velocity region of the Nyquist limit and shows reasonable accuracy between 0.5 x Nyquist limit and 1.5 x Nyquist limit with the error of estimation less than 15%. Conclusion Velocity information of CDFM is accurate in the limited region and is dependent on the Nyquist limit of each measurement;this can be explained by the effect of wall filter. Baseline-shift of CDFM should be limited to the region between 0.5 x Nyquist limit and 1.5 x Nyquist limit for accurate quantitation using velocity information of CDFM.
机译:背景技术已经尝试使用数字记录的彩色多普勒血流图(CDFM)的速度信息对心腔内的血流进行定量。但是,CDFM的准确性尚未得到系统的评估。该研究的目的是测试通过CDFM获得的数字记录速度信息的准确性。方法使用美国超声心动图学会体模,进行体外稳定流实验。通过Hewlett Packard Sonos 2500的CDFM对通过体模的八个不同流场(84、139、172、192、232、237、244、436 mL / sec)进行成像,并将所有数据存储在磁光盘中。可以看到多个别名,并使用7个不同的奈奎斯特极限(17、23、27、37、42、53、58厘米/秒)进行记录。全自动计算机算法用于解开别名并将CDFM转换为数字速度。在沿模型中心线的每个像素的9个连续值中,选择中间值作为代表值,并将其与实际值进行比较。结果在慢速区域,CDFM会高估真实速度,而在快速区域,它会低估真实速度。在2倍奈奎斯特极限的混叠点处,存在明显的湍流并且无法估计速度;混叠之后,CDFM的速度信息完全不可靠。 CDFM的速度估算在奈奎斯特极限的速度范围内最准确,在0.5 x Nyquist极限和1.5 x Nyquist极限之间显示出合理的精度,估算误差小于15%。结论CDFM的速度信息在有限的区域内是准确的,并且取决于每次测量的奈奎斯特极限;这可以用壁滤器的作用来解释。为了使用CDFM的速度信息进行准确定量,CDFM的基线偏移应限制在0.5 x Nyquist极限和1.5 x Nyquist极限之间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号