首页> 外文期刊>Mongolian Journal of Biological Sciences >Wildlife Hunting in Eastern Mongolia: Economic and Demographic Factors Influencing Hunting Behavior of Herding Households
【24h】

Wildlife Hunting in Eastern Mongolia: Economic and Demographic Factors Influencing Hunting Behavior of Herding Households

机译:蒙古东部的野生动物狩猎:影响牧民家庭狩猎行为的经济和人口因素

获取原文
       

摘要

Much of Mongolia’s rangelands are under state control and managed via traditionalland use practices and are habitat for numerous wildlife species harvested for theirmeat and fur. Political and economic transformations that have been occurring sincethe early 1990’s continues to aff ect all aspects of Mongolian society. To cope duringperiods of economic hardship, many turned to harvesting wildlife resources forincome and subsistence and this resulted in precipitous declines of some populations,marmots for example. Interviews with herding households in Mongolia’s easternsteppe region were conducted to better determine how wildlife resources (Mongoliangazelle, Siberian marmot, red foxes, corsac foxes, and gray wolf ) are utilized andvalued by herding families. Hunting, carried out by 65% of interviewees, returnedan average of $103±172 dollars per household.  e number of individuals hunted ofany particular species during the previous year ranged widely - 46% of householdshunted an average of 8±9 Mongolian gazelles (the equivalent of a small cow), 31%hunted 5±5 corsac foxes, 29% hunted 42±47 marmots, 22% hunted 3±3 red foxes,and 17% hunted 3±2 gray wolves. Diff erences in mean annual income betweenhunting and non-hunting households were similar ($1,292±1,132 vs. $1,080±1,196)however the median diff erence was greater ($1,009 vs $749). However, non-huntinghouseholds owned signi?? cantly more livestock than hunting households (168±183vs. 93±92 Livestock Units), and the proportion of hunting households living belowthe poverty line was higher. Households that were larger or had few numbers oflivestock were more likely to engage in hunting than smaller households with morelivestock. Household and livestock variables were also signi?? cant predictors of ahouseholds likelihood of hunting Mongolian gazelle, Siberian marmot, and corsacfox, but not for red fox or gray wolf. Wildlife management policies will likely receivegreater acceptance and compliance if subsistence hunting needs were incorporated.
机译:蒙古的大部分牧场都处于国家控制之下,并通过传统的土地使用方式进行管理,并且是为食用其肉类和毛皮而收获的众多野生生物的栖息地。自1990年代初以来发生的政治和经济变革继续影响着蒙古社会的各个方面。为了应对经济困难时期,许多人转向为收入和生活而采集野生动植物资源,这导致一些人口(例如旱獭)急剧下降。对蒙古东部草原地区的牧民家庭进行了访谈,以更好地确定牧民家庭如何利用野生动植物资源(蒙古野牛,西伯利亚土拨鼠,赤狐,科萨克斯狐狸和灰太狼)并对其进行估价。由65%的受访者进行的狩猎活动平均每户回馈$ 103±172美元。上一年,被捕到的任何特定物种的人数范围广泛-46%的家庭平均猎杀了8±9只蒙古瞪羚(相当于一头小母牛),31%的猎杀了5±5只科萨克斯狐狸,29%的猎杀了42 ±47只土拨鼠,22%猎杀3±3只红狐狸,17%猎杀3±2只灰狼。狩猎家庭和非狩猎家庭的平均年收入差异相似($ 1,292±1,132比$ 1,080±1,196),但是中位数差异更大($ 1,009对$ 749)。但是,非狩猎家庭拥有的所有权?牲畜的数量远远超过狩猎家庭(168±183对93±92牲畜单位),生活在贫困线以下的狩猎家庭所占的比例更高。与拥有更多牲畜的较小家庭相比,拥有更大牲畜或较少牲畜的家庭更有可能从事狩猎活动。家庭和牲畜变量也很显着?不能预测家庭捕食蒙古瞪羚,西伯利亚土拨鼠和corsacfox的可能性,但对于红狐狸或灰狼则不然。如果纳入了生存猎物的需求,野生动植物管理政策可能会得到更大的接受和遵守。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号