Immunophenotypic diversity of endometrial adenocarcinomas: implications for differential diagnosis

摘要

Many endometrial adenocarcinomas, particularly those of endometrioid type, express estrogen receptors (ERs), progesterone receptors (PRs), and vimentin. This typical immunophenotype is frequently considered a standard against which others are compared when immunohistochemistry is used for differential diagnosis. We tested large numbers of endometrial cancers, enriched for high-grade tumors, to determine whether this reported immunophenotype was valid and whether expression differences between types of endometrial carcinoma could be exploited for diagnostic purposes. Immunohistochemical stains were performed on the following types of endometrial cancers using established methodology: International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grades 1 and 2 endometrioid—42; FIGO grade 3 endometrioid—40; serous—24; clear cell—11; carcinosarcoma—9. In total, 92% of serous carcinomas expressed p16 strongly compared to weak-to-moderate expression of p16 in 7–67% of other tumors (FIGO grades 1 and 2 carcinoma and carcinosarcoma, respectively). A total of 84% of FIGO grades 1 and 2 carcinomas expressed ER compared to 9–54% of other tumors (clear cell and serous carcinomas respectively); 83% of FIGO grades 1 and 2 expressed PR compared to 11–54% of other carcinomas (carcinosarcoma and serous carcinoma, respectively). Most carcinomas were negative for monoclonal carcinoembryonic antigen (mCEA), and those that were positive showed mostly only focal membrane expression. Vimentin was expressed in nearly every tumor. Most tumors were diffusely vimentin positive, but a large range of expression patterns, from focal to diffuse and from weak to strong, was noted. Only 70% of FIGO grades 1 and 2 endometrioid carcinomas and 26% of grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas possessed the reportedly characteristic endometrial cancer immunophenotype p16 (-), ER (+), PR (+), mCEA (-), and vimentin (+). Endometrial cancers demonstrate substantial immunophenotypic diversity that remained apparent even within groups of similar histologic subtype and grade. ER, PR, and p16 expression was more illustrative of tumor type and degree of differentiation than they were of endometrial origin. In contrast, the vimentin-positive/CEA-negative phenotype remained the most constant among all endometrial cancers.