首页> 外文期刊>Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology >Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements with Optical Low-coherence Reflectometry and Partial-coherence Interferometry Optical Biometers
【24h】

Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements with Optical Low-coherence Reflectometry and Partial-coherence Interferometry Optical Biometers

机译:低相干反射光度法和偏相干干涉光度计对前节测量的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

AIMS: To evaluate a new noncontact optical biometer using partial-coherence interferometry and to compare the clinical measurements with those obtained from the device using optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR). SETTING AND DESIGN: Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey. Nonrandomized, prospective clinical trial SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study was performed on the healthy phakic eyes of volunteers in the year 2014. Measurements of axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness (CCT), mean keratometry (K), and white-to-white (WTW) measurements obtained with the low-time coherence interferometry (LTCI) were compared with those obtained with the OLCR. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The results were evaluated using Bland–Altman analyses. The differences between both methods were assessed using the paired t -test, and its correlation was evaluated by Pearson's coefficient. RESULTS: We examined seventy participants with a mean age of 33.06 (±9.7) (range: 19–53) years. AL measurements with LTCI and OLCR were 23.7 (±1.08) mm and 23.7 (±1.1) mm, respectively. ACD was 3.6 (±0.4) mm and 3.5 (±0.4) mm for LTCI and OLCR, respectively. The mean CCT measurements for both devices were 533 (±28) mm and 522 (±28) mm, respectively. The mean K readings measurements for LTCI and OLCR were 43.3 (±1.5) D and 43.3 (±1.5) D, respectively. The mean WTW distance measurements for both devices were 12.0 (±0.5) mm and 12.1 (±0.5) mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Measurements with LTCI correlated well with those with the OLCR. These two devices showed good agreement for the measurement of all parameters. Key words: Axial Length, Low Time Coherence Interferometry, Optical Biometer, Optical Low-Coherence Reflectometry.
机译:目的:评估使用部分相干干涉法的新型非接触式光学生物测定仪,并将临床测量结果与使用光学低相干反射法(OLCR)从该设备获得的测量结果进行比较。设置与设计:土耳其萨姆松Ondokuz Mayis大学。非随机,前瞻性临床试验研究对象和方法:该研究于2014年在志愿者的健康晶状体眼上进行。测量轴长(AL),前房深度(ACD),中央角膜厚度(CCT),平均角膜曲率( K),并将用低时相干干涉法(LTCI)获得的白到白(WTW)测量值与用OLCR获得的测量值进行比较。使用的统计分析:使用Bland–Altman分析评估结果。两种方法之间的差异使用配对t检验进行评估,其相关性通过皮尔森系数进行评估。结果:我们检查了70名参与者,他们的平均年龄为33.06(±9.7)岁(范围:19-53)。使用LTCI和OLCR进行的AL测量分别为23.7(±1.08)mm和23.7(±1.1)mm。 LTCI和OLCR的ACD分别为3.6(±0.4)mm和3.5(±0.4)mm。两种设备的平均CCT测量值分别为533(±28)mm和522(±28)mm。 LTCI和OLCR的平均K读数分别为43.3(±1.5)D和43.3(±1.5)D。两个设备的平均WTW距离测量值分别为12.0(±0.5)mm和12.1(±0.5)mm。结论LTCI的测量与OLCR的测量具有很好的相关性。这两个设备对于所有参数的测量显示出良好的一致性。关键词:轴长,低时相干干涉法,光学生物计,光学低相干反射法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号