首页> 外文期刊>Modern Economy >Deciding to Urban-Migrate and Agricultural Development: Evidence from the Millennium Challenge Account (MCC)-Millennium Development Authority (MiDA) Intervention Zones, Ghana
【24h】

Deciding to Urban-Migrate and Agricultural Development: Evidence from the Millennium Challenge Account (MCC)-Millennium Development Authority (MiDA) Intervention Zones, Ghana

机译:决定进行城市移民和农业发展:来自加纳的千年挑战账户(MCC)-千年发展局(MiDA)干预区的证据

获取原文
           

摘要

The decision to migrate involves both “push” and “pull” factors. Push factors force migrants out of rural areas while pull factors attract rural folks to the urban areas. The information set which displays the realities on the ground, if positive will motivate a potential migrant to move to an urban area and vice versa. Movement of labour for agriculture in the rural areas decreases resources needed to help promote the needed growth in the sector. With a sample size of 46,110 household members from two batches (about 3000 farmers/households for each batch) of selected farmers who enjoyed agricultural interventions (technology), a probit model is estimated to find the factors that influence the decision to urban-migrate. In particular we discuss the question of whether the MiDA intervention through the training of farmers on various techniques/technologies to be more productive, has had an impact on farmers’ as well as their household members’ decision to urban-migrate. Generally, household, Farmer Based Organization and individual characteristics were considered in the model. We find that, farmers and their household members in the Southern Horticultural belt were less likely to migrate while those in the Northern Agricultural Zone were more likely to migrate to the urban area. Education, households with returned migrants, and remittances were positive in influencing the decision to urban-migrate. On the other hand, being self-employed and being married reduces the probability that an individual will migrate. Generally, the differential economic opportunities through the relative increased knowledge in the urban areas remain a pull factor of labour resources of the undeveloped rural agricultural sector. Bridging the gap between the expected income differential of rural and urban areas resulting from differences in knowledge and opportunities will be the key to reducing this phenomenon as suggested by [4] and many other studies.
机译:迁移的决定涉及“推动”和“拉动”因素。推动因素迫使移民离开农村地区,而推动因素则将农村居民吸引到城市地区。能够显示实地现实情况的信息集(如果是积极的话)将激励潜在的移民迁往城市地区,反之亦然。农村地区农业劳动力的转移减少了有助于促进该部门所需增长的资源。以两批(每批约3000名农民/家庭)经过农业干预(技术)的选定农民的46,110个家庭成员为样本,估计了一个概率模型,以找出影响决定进行城市迁移的因素。特别是,我们讨论了以下问题:MiDA干预通过对农民进行各种技术/技术培训来提高生产力,是否对农民及其家庭成员的城市移民决定产生了影响。通常,在模型中考虑了家庭,基于农民的组织和个人特征。我们发现,南部园艺带的农民及其家庭成员迁移的可能性较小,而北部农业区的农民及其家庭成员迁移的可能性更大。教育,移民回国的家庭和汇款对影响城市移民的决定产生了积极影响。另一方面,自雇和结婚减少了个人移民的可能性。一般而言,由于城市地区知识的相对增加,不同的经济机会仍然是欠发达农村农业部门劳动力资源的拉动因素。如[4]和许多其他研究所建议的那样,缩小由知识和机会的差异导致的城乡预期收入差异之间的差距将是减少这一现象的关键。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号