...
首页> 外文期刊>GMS Psycho - Social - Medicine >The prevalence of medical services use. How comparable are the results of large-scale population surveys in Germany?
【24h】

The prevalence of medical services use. How comparable are the results of large-scale population surveys in Germany?

机译:医疗服务使用的普遍性。德国大规模人口调查的结果可比性如何?

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The large-scale representative population surveys conducted by Germany’s Robert Koch Institute (RKI) contain questions pertaining to health and its determinants as well as the prevalence and frequency of outpatient services utilization. The same holds for the Socioeconomic Panel (SOEP, Sozio-?konomisches Panel) and the Bertelsmann Healthcare Monitor (Gesundheitsmonitor) surveys. The purpose of this study is to examine the comparability of the instruments used in these surveys and their results. Methods: The questions on outpatient care utilization examined in this study were taken from the public use files of the East-West Health Survey (Ost-West Survey; OW1991), the 1998 Federal National Health Survey (Bundesgesundheitssurvey; BGS1998), the 2003 Telephone Health Survey (TEL2003), and the 2009 German Health Update (Gesundheit in Deutschland aktuell GEDA2009). The study also used data from the 26 waves of the SOEP (1984–2009) and the 16 waves of the Bertelsmann Healthcare Monitor (2001–2009) studies. Results: In the OW1991 and the BGS1998, questions on outpatient services utilization differ by the types of physicians inquired about. The four-week prevalence of contact with general practitioneers (GP) was 29% in the OW1991; the twelve-month prevalence in the BGS1998 was 69%. The OW1991 and the BGS1998 also surveyed participants on the number of physician contacts made during those reference periods (average number of contacts: 1.8 over the previous four weeks (OW1991) and 4.9 over the previous 12 months (BGS1998)). The TEL2003 inquires into the three-month prevalence of contact with private practice physicians in general (63%) as well as the number of contacts with primary care physicians over the previous twelve months (88% with at least one contact, average number of contacts: 4.6, range: 1–92). In the GEDA2009 survey, 88% of participants reported having contacted a physician at least once over the previous twelve months and an average of 6.1 contacts with all physicians working under contract with the German statutory health insurance (SHI) funds. The 2009 SOEP survey revealed a 28% three-month prevalence of contact with all types of physicians and an average of 3.6 contacts (among participants who had made at least one contact during this period). According to the Bertelsmann Health Monitor, the twelve-month prevalence of contact with GPs was 82%, with the average number of contacts being 5.0. The Bertelsmann Health Monitor also surveys participants on contacts made with four other types of physicians; the OW1991 and the BGS1998 ask about contacts made with over ten different types of physicians when examining the frequency of services use. Conclusions: Not only do the target groups of the RKI surveys, the SOEP and the Bertelsmann Health Monitor differ; their questions on outpatient care utilization also differ in terms of examined reference period and types of physicians contacted by survey participants, question wording including clarifications (e.g., asking the participant to also consider contacts not made “in person” with physicians when answering a question), and response categories. Therefore, unlike the results of the surveys’ questions on inpatient care, the results of questions on the use of outpatient care services are not easily comparable, even those regarding contact with primary care physicians and GPs. The results of secondary analyses of German SHI claims data could be used to confirm the external validity of the surveys’ results.
机译:背景:德国罗伯特·科赫研究所(RKI)进行的大规模代表性人口调查包含与健康及其决定因素以及门诊服务使用的普遍性和频率有关的问题。社会经济专家组(SOEP,Sozio-konkonsches专家组)和贝塔斯曼医疗保健监测机构(Gesundheitsmonitor)的调查也是如此。这项研究的目的是检查在这些调查中使用的工具及其结果的可比性。方法:本研究中有关门诊护理利用的问题来自东西方健康调查(Ost-West调查; OW1991),1998年联邦国家健康调查(Bundesgesundheitssurvey; BGS1998),2003年电话的公共使用文件。健康调查(TEL2003)和2009年德国健康更新(Gesundheit in Deutschland aktuell GEDA2009)。该研究还使用了来自SOEP的26次波(1984-2009)和贝塔斯曼医疗保健监测报告的16次波(2001-2009)的数据。结果:在OW1991和BGS1998中,门诊服务利用的问题因所咨询医生的类型而异。在OW1991中,与全科医生(GP)接触的四周患病率为29%。 BGS1998中的12个月患病率为69%。 OW1991和BGS1998还调查了参与者在这些参考期间的医生联系数量(平均联系数量:前四周为1.8(OW1991)和前12个月为4.9(BGS1998))。 TEL2003会查询与私人执业医生的三个月接触率(63%),以及过去十二个月与初级保健医生的接触数(88%,至少有一个接触,平均接触数) :4.6,范围:1-92)。在GEDA2009调查中,有88%的参与者报告说在过去的12个月中至少联系过一次医生,并且与根据德国法定健康保险(SHI)合同工作的所有医生平均有6.1次联系。 2009年SOEP调查显示,与所有类型的医生接触的三个月患病率为28%,平均3.6个接触者(在此期间至少进行了一次接触的参与者中)。根据贝塔斯曼健康监视器,与全科医生接触的十二个月患病率为82%,平均接触人数为5.0。贝塔斯曼健康监测中心还调查参与者与其他四种类型医生的联系。 OW1991和BGS1998询问在检查服务使用频率时与十多种不同类型的医生进行的联系。结论:不仅RKI调查的目标群体,SOEP和贝塔斯曼健康监测组织都不同。他们关于门诊护理利用的问题在所检查的参考期间和调查参与者联系的医生类型方面也有所不同,问题措辞包括澄清(例如,要求参与者在回答问题时也考虑与医生不是“亲自”进行的联系)和响应类别。因此,与调查中有关住院护理的问题的结果不同,就门诊护理服务的使用而言,即使是与初级保健医生和全科医生联系的问题,其结果也不容易比较。德国SHI索赔数据的二次分析结果可用于确认调查结果的外部有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号